Melissa Harris-Perry marginalizes hard work
According to Melissa Harris-Perry, an MSNBC host, we have to be "super careful" about the term "hard worker." Apparently we have a new term to add to the growing list of trigger warnings. What could be wrong with the term "hard worker," you might ask? It seems it could be deemed racist or demeaning to underprivileged members of society. You can see this rant here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKdtA...
There is so much that is disgusting about this rant that it is hard to know where to begin. It could be taken merely as an attempt to undercut the interviewee's (Alfonso Aguilar) praise of Paul Ryan, but it could cut deeper whether done intentionally or not. Is she trying to control others' thinking by controlling language?
Perhaps she is trying to undermine the value of hard work, itself. How are Objectivists - who hold the virtue of productiveness in high esteem - to view that?
How could one counter a comment like that if you came across it in a conversation with a liberal?
There is so much that is disgusting about this rant that it is hard to know where to begin. It could be taken merely as an attempt to undercut the interviewee's (Alfonso Aguilar) praise of Paul Ryan, but it could cut deeper whether done intentionally or not. Is she trying to control others' thinking by controlling language?
Perhaps she is trying to undermine the value of hard work, itself. How are Objectivists - who hold the virtue of productiveness in high esteem - to view that?
How could one counter a comment like that if you came across it in a conversation with a liberal?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
My last favorite President RWR said you can get a lot done around here if you don't care who gets the credit.
As long as I'm thinking about it-no matter where the best idea comes from-I would like to see a vomit, puked, or plain stupid award. I believe we are approaching the tipping point in our country. I believe since the Great Society up to Yale students not knowing what the First Amendment is..... stupid is winning. I think it makes perfect sense for like minded Gulcher's to at least recognize publicly and in a amusing way--the award winner. Frankly I want to see TAS or GG taking some face time and recognition going into not only the election but to start conditioning the potential audience for AS the Mini Series. Spend the next year pointing out this ridiculous illiterate garbage and by the way stay tuned for our TV series..... Maybe wishful thinking
reversed, also!!! -- j
.
It all comes down to them, what they think, what you make them think, because they really believe that their shit doesn't stink.
Using this rant by MH-P as an example, there is a danger in dismissing people who make destructive comments like this. The danger occurs in face-to-face encounters, not in second-hand ones like this. There is nothing we will say here that will ever get back to MH-P, but thinking about this incident serves an instructive purpose for me by providing an incentive to think about ways to respond to such asinine comments if I encounter them face-to-face. That’s why I asked the question about how you Gulchers might respond. I think the worst thing would be to not respond at all. The second worst thing would be to respond with snide or derogatory comments.
The most important thing is to register some kind of disagreement. In many face-to-face encounters, there are often other participants or just listeners. You might not say anything that will change the mind of the perpetrator, but you might of another listener. I ‘m thinking here of the many social situations one finds one’s self in on almost daily a basis. Except for committed hermits, I’m sure these situations arise often. I think of these “situations” as opportunities to let it be knows that the perpetrator’s view isn’t the only one and isn’t valid. They are opportunities to influence others and get them thinking about reasonable alternatives to the tripe that often comes out the mouths of progressives. Teachable moments, one might say.
Dismissing or ignoring destructive comments like MH-P’s carries some dangers – both substantive and tactical. (Again, this applies mostly to in-person encounters.) I’ve sort of addressed the substantive issue above – bad ideas need to be countered. Tactically, it is also mistake. A non-response reinforces to the perp and to anyone else aware of the discussion that the perp is winning. Undermining the validity of a destructive idea should be taken at every opportunity. Another tactical point is that you need to understand your enemy. Not just his ideas, but his tactics. Suggesting that one should not think of people like MH-P (like freedomforall) or take the time to look in on what people on msnbc are saying (like wiggys) and just ignore them concedes the entire battlefield to them.
She truly has to be one of those folks who stay up late, nights, thinking this stuff up.
Productive=hard work=$for all.
virtue for all those who deserve it! . whether it's a mom
changing a diaper or a dad designing a building, a son
mowing a lawn or a daughter digging a ditch, they are
all productive and deserving of praise. . if it drags up
memories of slaves, it should be thoughts of praise
for people who were productive and valuable! -- j
.
Load more comments...