Just when you think it can't get more stupid: “Hillary wonders: Why is a State Department employee using personal e-mail?”

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago to Politics
42 comments | Share | Flag

An email using hillary's private non secured email server has this gem ....

Why is a State Department Employee using private email for official business.


THIS is NOT evidence of presidential material.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by Zero 9 years, 3 months ago
    My coffee almost went out my nose when I saw this.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
    It may be that Mrs. Clinton is delusional when it suits her. I'm no shrink, but I have know people who perform reprehensible acts and then proclaim in all sincerity that they never did it, or were unaware of it, or someone else did it. Even though the evidence is irrefutable they will distance themselves from it so convincingly that followers who wish it were true, will choose to believe the blatant lie. Bill is even better at it. I bet they'd both pass lie detector tests.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
    Difference between Hillary and Nixon? 18 minute versus four years. I couldn't bring myself to contemplate the other choice.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exactly. I think O'Malley is in there as a younger option who also gets defeated by Hillary. Makes it all look legit.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
    Or in another released HillaryMail she orders a state department employee to erase all the classifiction markings and use private email.

    Some how the excuse of following policy and regulations is so fricking bogus from the individual who sets policy and regulations.

    What does she say to that employee. Upside is YOU may get away with it. Downside is YOU get caught.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by roneida 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    to Richrobinson, I think the dems are paying Bernie Sanders to appear to offer an alternate and not seem too cocky in presenting only Bills wife..they know Sanders doesn't have a chance but he will draw the most foolish to not believe the nomination is not rigged by the fools-in charge.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The first sentence of your response, besides the rest that you wrote, is further backed up by Presidebt O'Bullcrap being elected twice.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 3 months ago
    The Clintons depend on the utter stupidity of the American voter. The whole defense of Bill's sexual predation was literally what rapists have tried, ineffectually, in courtrooms, which is that women really want his attention. Hillary's defense of her blatant disregard for protecting classified material is that none of the emails in question had classified markings, so they couldn't be classified. While that may seem laughable to those of us who have experience dealing with classified information, to a general public unschooled in such things, it sounds logical.

    Even if the FBI is successful at building a solid case for criminal disregard for protection of national secrets, it's doubtful the AG, Loretta Lynch, will issue an indictment against Hillary. The backstory will undoubtedly leak, but it will be easily played as just another "right wing conspiracy."

    The real backfire on the Clintons is building, and it revolves around Bill's "bimbo eruptions," and Hillary's role in the brutal suppression of those women's testimony. What some of the media pundits don't yet get is that the younger voters didn't live through the sex scandals of Bill Clinton that happened over 20 years ago, and they've been much more sensitized to women's rights and sexual abuse. As the old information is rehashed and disclosed, that will have a bigger impact with younger voters than the confusing email fiasco.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 9 years, 3 months ago
    When I saw this post, my first thought is that it was something from The Onion.

    The fact it's actually true just reinforces your point; definitely not evidence of presidential material.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 3 months ago
    This is how these people think. "These are not the droids you are looking for..."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 9 years, 3 months ago
    Her list of unqualifications for President continues to grow. The Democrats don't appear to have a legitimate alternative so I guess they have no choice but to defend and protect her as best they can.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
    URL or the subject title you got read this to wonder :Smartest woman in the world? Not even close.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo