this is an interesting article, with details which I have
wanted to know for awhile. . Thank You, FFA!

please note, however, that Saddam Hussein did send
many of his WMDs to Syria, and among those which remained
was the one which killed my brother-in-law by ruining
his lungs. . the "lie-based" statement is itself based
on media hype. -- j
.

Not that I can see.

There you go again trying to change the subject.

My mistake. I should have said the other statist (GOP and Dem) candidates.
Could be right about being screwed though ;^)

Not to make light of your question, but

Can anyone who is fit, justify funding a campaign given the tendency of the voters to insanity and ignorance?

Has Johnson joined the race as Libertarian?

You are assuming a fact not in evidence. I support Cruz.

That's true. On top of everything else, she's just downright incompetent.

Are there any one-eyed men available?

Stop trying to change the subject as an excuse for supporting Trump.
The discussion is about "fit to rule", ethical acceptablility for president, not what products are in the market.
Trump is unacceptable as a president.

Exactly correct. I could not agree more.

So you would regulate what vendors may sell?

Trump's "positions" are band-aid bullshit that do nothing to solve the problems. They are more of the same socialist, statist rubbish.

Just because people choose of their free will to buy a product that is harmful does not forgive the seller for his unethical choice of "product."
If someone wants to gamble that is their choice, but it does not make the casino operator a valid choice for president of the US.
I think Trump's past behavior must be used to predict his future behavior, just as I think the GOP's past behavior should be used to predict their future behavior.
Trump and the GOP deserve each other, but neither deserve anyone's vote or support.

"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything." Joseph Stalin

I suspect that the computers in the key states are already being rigged.

"That's not business, it's looting. In business, both parties gain value from a deal." LOOTING is employing force. I doubt any of the people that have signed contracts with him were forced to do so. They may have made bad decisions but THEY made the decisions.

"he is no different from the rest of the candidates"

In other words, there is no candidate worthy? Boy, we are screwed!!!

who is the most fit for the position of president of the usa that is currently vying for the position?

"then present those problems and solutions in a businesslike, rational way" SEE: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions

" casinos that overtly steal from its customers" Casinos offer something and people of free will make the choice. That they are, for the most part, not statistically astute, does not change the fact that they make the choice. Caveat emptor.

Democrat win? What did W Bush do for for individual rights, limited government, and laissez-faire capitalism? Answer: worse than nothing - he diminished all of the three.

Voting for the lesser of two evils just sinks you further into slavery.

So-called conservatives have wasted votes on the GOP for decades.
The state gets bigger under every GOP administration, and all you do is whine about third parties having no chance and continue to support the evil statist party.
The founders of America had no guarantees; you don't get any either.
Realistically the British should have crushed the American revolution.
Your votes for evil are the problem. You are responsible for the massive government, but all you do is whine and make irrational excuses for the statists you support.

I still think Hillary will be the next president anyway. I've been saying that for about three years now. Let's see if I'm right...

We still have a Constitution? Could have fooled me. :)

Dino, just vote for the person who best represents your principles and is most likely to uphold them. That should exclude anyone that the statists put forward as their candidate.

Let's be realistic here. No election in my memory ever had a third part candidate come close to winning. If that were a REAL possiblitity ( and not just an "if" ), I would certainly join you. In the meantime, I hope more people will join me than you.

Galt Damned constitution keeps getting in the way!
All those competing looters are a problem, too. That's where being POTUS is vital. Executive Orders! Woo-Hoo!

The evil I perceive ffa is that no candidate is defending the first ten amendments to the Constitution, limited government, and laissez-faire capitalism. I'll be voting in my 13th presidential election in 2016 and, maybe, Goldwater and Reagan came closest. But even they weren't anywhere near being radicals for individual rights and capitalism. And, of course, Goldwater never got the chance to prove me wrong.