All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 2 months ago
    That's not what we're facing. About 8 years ago is when I first realized we decided to stop facing it. I remember it well - Bush's first bailout.

    The financial uncertainty we are facing is due to our central bank, combined with opaque taxation and regulations.

    And, yes, we should expect it. I expect a lot more.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 2 months ago
    As long as it's technologies such as weaving machines which destroyed non productive means and created or significantly enlarged textiles and other markets. Transportation, Distribution, retail marketing and more.

    If it's destruction by government with the only purpose to disrupt and destroy then we should not have to expect this.

    If the second occurs the explanation is simple. We chose the wrong government.

    If it occurred through the use of criminal elements outside government same answer. Government should be alert for this sort of activity not aiding and abetting.

    If the first situation occurs without undue interference then we chose the right government.

    Applied this to todays situation where both choices WILL be the wrong choice.

    That means we chose the wrong method of choosing government.

    Whose fault is that? All we had to do was follow the rule book instead of ignoring it.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo