All Comments
- 1Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.YesPermalink|
- Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
- Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
- 1Posted by Zenphamy 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.I think you're right, but those two (Kagan and Sotomayer) are going to give us a lot of trouble for a lot of years. Nobody knows what Roberts will do.Permalink|
- 1Posted by $ AJAshinoff 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.the entire law is an affront to individual liberty and the Constitution. It by it nature is very complicated and lacks uniformity. Me thinks the SCOTUS should worry more about Constitutionality than trying to ensure how the law works most smoothly - that would be the legislatures job.Permalink|
- 2Posted by $ AJAshinoff 11 years, 1 month agoLeftist bit*hes. Pardon my candor. It sickens me that O could post such alien excrement to the SCOTUS. These political appointees were placed specifically to keep his idiotology functional long after he's deposed, defamed, and hopefully imprisoned. I do hope, without much certainty, that rOberts - O's hip-pocket judas, shows more fidelity to the US Constitution this time when he votes to uphold the individuals right to choose when/how/where his/her money is spent.Permalink|
- 2Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.If he didn't do the right thing with bocare he won't with this either. They still have his dirt.Permalink|
- Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
- 2Posted by LetsShrug 11 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.lol The one of the Statue of Liberty was a little easier to look at then those two hags, isn't it?Permalink|