If we can put the Guatemalans on planes and send them north to the USA, we should be able to do the same for liberals who are flooding Florida...send them back up north.

Ah, the Cllintons are still at it.

I take it that you don't want PC "elite betters" all into their Climate Change religion to do your thinking for you.
(Someone get my tongue out of my cheek. It's stuck!)

$@^#$%ers sue me and see what I do in response.
The world is round and it revolves around the sun, dammit.

Oh no! That made me shake.

I'd hate for this to go all the way to the Supreme Court if Hitlery or Bolshevik Bernie wins.

I have relatives like that especially on my mother's side. Many have moved from the north (where I was born) to central Florida.

There is a supportive sentiment among EcoNazis~

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41yJT...

I understand. Who wants to be bullied into being an adapt or die liar for the state?
If it should come down to it, I'd rather we all go out taking a stand like Stonewall Jackson than to do a Socrates.

On a lighter (and decidedly un-PC) note:
Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZegQ...
a la Mel Brooks

“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win.”
― Mahatma Gandhi

Sounds like an intimidation threat. But wouldn't it be interesting to have a trial against one of the non-alarmist scientist that turns out to be a Readen type? Then through the court's discovery process, expose the cabal to grow a global warming industry based on fuzzy science and computer model manipulation?

LOL! The trouble with my onetime small beach community is that so many from the northeast have moved in. Unfortunately, they have brought their liberalism and socialism with them.

OMG! This is really getting scary! Now anyone with scientific facts disproving man made Global Warming will be criminally prosecuted! Unbelievable!

allosaur said: "Do not blaspheme against the pseudo-science religion of the collective."

The reason for this article is that the AGW people are scared. A decade ago, hardly anyone dared to murmur that they were wrong; now entire countries are openly dissing them. It is hard to overestimate the power that would be given to 'those who control carbon'. The fact that the liberals almost had that and can feel it "...slip through their fingers..." (Leia) is tormenting them.

An increasing number of prominent scientists and former-Greens are coming out against AGW. It is an increasingly uphill battle for the Greens to try to defame each one of them in turn. General polls of both the importance of AGW and the validity of AGW have been sliding downhill rapidly.

It is good that Lynch is doing this. If she gets FBI 'approval' and tries to go ahead, a lot of organizations will jump up to contest this on constitutional grounds.

They are running scared.

Jan

The climate on this planet has changed more often than Hillaries position on anything. Its the weather governed by the sun.

Although the thought of taking Hemlock is displeasing, I would rather that than dismiss the evidence and preach the lies.

Do not blaspheme against the pseudo-science religion of the collective.

I noticed that the libtard religion of Global Warming was relabeled as Climate Change when the weather warming aspect of this control freak conspiracy no longer looked so hot.
Of course, there has always been climate change. Therefore, whatever the weather does is man-made and money needs to be thrown at it while coal miners lose jobs. .

I can see your point.
Living in an age of scientific learning and innovation, this one question of "Human Involvement in Climate Change" seems to perplex me. I know I'm a geologist, and have a better than average understanding of earth processes, but the stuff that comes out of these people's mouths make me aggravated. In the most part due to the fact that If I try to set the record straight, they will denounce me and it has nearly come to violence on their end a few times. Are these "Climate" questions such a hard thing for people to learn and understand, or it more that these changes occur so slowly (that one or two lifespans is still not long enough) that people cannot conceive of them?

i will be one of the ones they send the black helicopters to collect. A couple years ago on Earth Day, I wrote a letter to the editor wishing everyone a happy Earth Day, stating it just happened to be Lenin's birthday. I then asked if they thought it coincidence, especially since Gorbachev came over and got the green agenda in US government school0, while still holding his communist party card. I try to blog the truth online each year as well. Funny Justice Lynch does not mind that Move On. org hired people to cause unrest at the Trump rally, much as Obama's ACORN did at bank and corporate stockholder meetings. Dangerous is only what does not promote the liberal takeover agenda. At least Rubio did say that there is "climate change," because climate change has always happened.

Shades of Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition. All those that defy sacred truths are declared anathema and excommunicate. AGW aka "Climate Change" is ten percent science and ninety percent politics. There is enough sloppiness in climate change science that an objective criticism is not only warranted it is the duty of honest scientists to question both the methodology and the conclusions. In another thread I pointed out the fallacy of using static rather than dynamic models in complex problems. For the politician AGW is not a problem it is an opportunity to wield power under the color of a scientific "consensus" even if such a consensus is fabricated. The end justifies the means.

Because we have been Progressively entering as new dark one since early in the last century.
(That's my reply after off and on mulling over your question for about an hour).

The surprise would be if Lynch did nothing about it.

I salute you for the courage of your convictions.
If some libtard in my neighborhood had turned of his lights, everyone here would have thought he had gone to bed.