State Science Institute found!

Posted by Robbie53024 11 years ago to Science
47 comments | Share | Flag

Believe it or not, this is a peer reviewed paper - meaning that other scientists checked the assertions and found them replicable.

Lying about the data is OK because it advances socialism, and everyone knows that socialism is the best system.

I hesitate to categorize this under science, as it is anti-science.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Correct. It is merely another front used by the collectivists to subvert freedom and enact world socialism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Everything our government does is about control of the citizens. You must realize that socialism does not care about facts. The end justifies the means!!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 11 years ago
    All other forms of ethics are dead with the Socialists in Democratic clothing in my party.
    Why shouldn't they kill off scientific ethics as well?

    Thanks for the story.
    Keep speaking up.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by KYFHO 11 years ago
    No argument, no rationale, no debate, no proof will change the attitude of the politicians and corrupt companies involved in what is now called climate change. It is their cash cow, their control mechanism to more cash and more control. Ditto for the masses who piled on the climate bandwagon. They are zealots. This is their religion. Their gods are gore and his ilk. Just as you cannot convince an islamic jihadist that he should not kill people in the name of allah, you cannot convince climate asses that there is not anthropologically caused climate change. The part I continually have a hard time understanding is why anyone would insist on pushing their beliefs on anyone else "for their own good" or otherwise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kittyhawk 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks! I'm a long-time observer of the Gulch here, and a big Ayn Rand fan. I finally reset my password so I could comment as well as read and learn in this forum.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 11 years ago
    All I want to know is if the seas are going to rise because of global warming then why did Al Gore buy a multimillion home on the beach???
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kittyhawk 11 years ago
    If you want to understand the pseudo-science behind "climate change" I highly recommend James Corbett's "The IPCC Exposed" video: http://www.corbettreport.com/the-ipcc-ex... It's rather lengthy, about 45 minutes long, but well worth the time to find out how science has been manipulated.

    When I asked my mother what she thought about "global warming":a few years ago, she said she can remember the environmentalists threatening that we were causing a "new ice age" in the 1970s, which I was too young to recall. So, it's too cold, then it's too hot... what next?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    First it is interesting that they are economists for Dept. of Agriculture, the one place the Agenda 21 folks want to start when exerting control, ie: farming with tractors is "not sustainable."
    Next, lie lie lie, to get control. Not one mention of true government controlled installations which do aim to change the weather: HAMP and HAARP. With over 20 government installations in various countries, why, if they are truly interested in climate change, is there never any mention of the above. Maybe because they are government, and it is people they wish to control, even if they have to lie.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Amongst all the mistakes the US government has made in the last 60 years, the most consistent and expensive ones are the lengthy wars that we have gotten into with no intention of winning quickly (Korea, Viet Nam, drugs, the former Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, ...).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by irrelevantcommentforpoint 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    If the profit motive could be removed, I think that war would be much less likely.
    While I applaude profit motive in general as being a beneficial incentive for the advancement of humankind, there are some "enterprises" that I think are morally perverse, e.g., the banking "industry" profiting from encouraging war by lending to all parties to a conflict.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    During wartime decisions are made that are wrong. Wrong for the right reasons, perhaps, but nevertheless, wrong. The bombing of Dresden was one of them. Such things happen in any physical combat, but today, the numbers involved are usually so big that the consequences are most dreadful. However, while I don't believe in war, I do believe in self defense and all that it implies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    ooooh, nooooo, Mr Bill ! there may be alien life among us! they breed, vote and write articles!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ob1 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Regular study of the news is an exercise in observing the ironic, per the above example..

    "The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other - until the day when they are suddenly declared to be the country's official ideology". ~ Ayn Rand-ATLAS SHRUGGED
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 11 years ago in reply to this comment.
    p.s. that is, like human CO2 causes today's climate change, sex causes death because it came first!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo