While khaling's favorite past time is denying reality.

You may be right. But for the moment, the only interest in WHY women are so determined to destroy America isn't quite so important as establishing beyond doubt that THEY ARE. Some deniers on this very site are in DENIAL about what women are doing to America.

Ironically, their effort to get more and be safe will bring them less and endanger them. Not a very bright strategy… but as you point out, it may be that women are purely tactical in their "thinking", while men are more strategic.

In my experience, the better debaters of the female variety tend to be on the right, not the left.

Do we need to resort to name calling?

I think that this might have more to do with a short-term focus vs. longer-term. Women are nurturers and the raisers of children which is a very "now" type activity. You can't spend a lot of time thinking about what you are going to feed the kids tomorrow if you don't have anything to eat today.

On the other hand, the males tend to be more longer-term oriented. They are the builders of shelter, those that plant today so as to reap tomorrow.

I had a comment on a post (maybe even this one) that described this in more detail. This would not seem to be a gender specific thing, rather a role response. If the males were the caregivers and females the builders and providers, then I think the rationality would be reversed. Just a thought.

But if it's "her body, her choice", then why do males get stuck paying child support if "her choice" is what's being expressed?

>> the republican party has "been actively trying to strip away the laws which protect African Americans and other minorities

I think that refers to trying to roll back legislation that steals money from working Americans and confers it on bitches-of-color who decide to get knocked up without a plan to support the biological result.

Hmm. Is it racist to observe that 13% of the population commits 51% of all murders, and that the 13% are black?

Is that why so many more liberals are female than are male?

Ironically, abortion may be one of the major reasons that our overall crime rate is down the past couple decades. Women who don't want babies and don't have them don't wind up with babies who are raised to be psychopathic killers (in general).

Jodi Arias is a woman.

Is she included?

The majority of women in America routinely vote to steal your money and spend it on themselves.
Are they included too?

Depends on what you mean.

Are you asking if there's a redeeming quality that all women have, or if all women have at least one redeeming quality, or if there exists at least one woman who has at least one redeeming quality… or something else.

Let's say that asking a clear question is NOT one of your redeeming qualities.

But quite apart from that, the tendency of SOME women to make facts personal is NOT a redeeming quality. For example, I give you hard facts, and you respond with a non sequitur. Not a redeeming quality. Inability of some women to engage on a factual, rational level - NOT a redeeming quality.

Does that help?

Except, if you look at the facts, you'll notice that the gender gap is now 20%. That the Republican Party is mostly male, and the Demoncrat party is mostly female.

Some conjectures on why that may be.

I think men generally look at government as the social "grease" to keep society from developing too much friction. Got a beef with your neighbor? Don't shoot it out, go to small claims court. Some moron wants to do 100mph through your neighborhood? Don't string a steel cable a head-height… let the cops handle it.

But I think women fundamentally view government through different lenses. They see government as a means to increase their access to resources… other people's resources. The evidence that deficit spending is directly tied to the female vote in America is incontrovertible. In every state, and at the federal level, deficits were small and generally amounted to unforeseen expenses which were paid for in the next year's budget. So basically, debt was resolved - at all levels - on an annual basis.

Once women got the vote, that all changed. In each state individually, and at the Federal level, once women got the vote, deficits began to grow out-of-control.

So men want to (generally) use government to make things work better, while women want to use government to steal from other people for their own purposes.

Is this a "monolithic" characteristic? Of course not. There are, after all, male Demoncrats, and female Republicans. But when push comes to shove, women will vote to take your food off your table and put it on their own. That's what a 20% gender gap tells us.

What is the consequence? A $17.3 trillion debt, $210+ trillion in unfunded mandates and about 25% of the Federal budget funded through loans. This is the equivalent of the female who in abject confusion declares, "I can't be out of money… I still have checks."

Bottom line: The majority of men have it right. The majority of women are working to destroy America (and probably don't even realize it.)

1. Fair enough.
2. Laws that are applied universally but only impact certain groups are still a form of institutionalized discrimination.
3. Yes, but I don't see why parents need a special voucher to change schools.
4. I agree that abortion should be carefully considered, but to me, she did absolutely sound like she was advocating banning abortion, or at least severely limiting women's ability to access it.