

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 10.
And, umm yes. Electability, 3rd party or otherwise, is what I meant by viable.
Johnson is way more across the board sensible. Whether he or any 3rd party candidate can get elected is another question and perhaps what you in part mean by "viable".
And the most important word in the quote that I included in the title is "viable." Which Johnson definitely is not.
I have limited respect for that publication. The author banned em form commenting for intelligent careful questioning of premises evident in some of the articles.
(This is based on historical reading of the OS. It could have changed in recent times.)