Limbaugh: The GOP Establishment Will Vote Hillary To Keep Their Fiefdoms

Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago to Politics
42 comments | Share | Flag

There are times when We The Serfdom just do not appreciate the ivory towers so needful to our more than equal elite betters, who are also in the GOP.
Election time is one of them.

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years ago
    If what Limbaugh says is true, and it comes to pass, then even vestiges of the Republican party will no longer remain after November.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years ago
    The republican party is an anachronism and its end is near. Its a money making and favor preserving marketing organization which stands for NOTHING at all.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago
    and yet 95% of the registered voters that actually vote will vote for the exact same thing....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years ago
    I never thought I'd see the day when Alex Jones started to make sense, but the bizarre turns going on in the world today have made me wonder if at least some of his wild conspiracy rants might be justified. The obvious collapse of the GOP, apparently with the willful intent of its elite, and the willingness of the establishment to see a completely unscrupulous criminal not only avoid indictment, but ascend to the national Executive makes the "New World Order" cries sound justified.

    Obama's statement that he didn't need the approval of the Senate to ratify the new climate change agreement, and the lack of outrage over that statement makes me think the sheeple have reached the prime conditioning point.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Whoa! Democrats In Name Only! Me old dino likes the concept.
    The Democrat Party I recall from when I was a juvenile dino delinquent tried to block the Equal Rights Act that a GOP with actual guts pushed through.
    Now Democrats In Name only wants to those they once denied equal rights on the progressive plantation.
    DINO . . . . .just looking at it.
    Gulp! No! No! Nooo! NOOOOOOOOOO!!!
    The horror! The horror!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Riftsrunner 9 years ago
    The problem with them trying to keep their power is they need to remain relevant. Once you screw over the people who you are supposed to represent, they will walk away from you and with them goes their power (ie. what they receive in our democratic republic from their voters). I for one would form another party before I would go back to supporting the GOP, if they sell out their constituency just to maintain their foot on our necks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years ago
    Time for the Libertarian party to step up and fill the gap left by the freedom-taking religious and freedom-taking socialists. They need to paint government as the ultimate enabled corporation, and ask the young people why they should send their money to government for disbursement.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Now that's a good way to put it just as for the left Left Liberals In Name Only suits to match up with Democrats in name only. I don't know what you would call the right except splintered and disorganized but the left are garden variety socialists from RINOs and CINOS through DINOS and LINOS all the way out to well well lookee here Mr. Marx, Mr. Engels, Mr. Lenin, Comrade Sanders, Mr. Mussolini and descendants Benita Pelosillyni, Comrade Clintonie, and Donald The Hun. Donald's along for those who enjoy WWII movies..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Guess Alabama old dino's long been blinded to that fact by having great conservative senators like Sessions and Shelby and a representatives like the current Palmer.
    CINO.....just looking at it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Problem is that the GOP has been that way since its inception. So they aren't RINO's, they are conservatives in name only. There were some constitutional conservatives promiinent in the GOP back in the 50s and 60s, but they never had control.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago
    "The GOP's "primary objective" is self-preservation, not winning the White House in this cycle,"

    That has been true in every election after 1984. Conservatives could have won the white house in 1992, 1996, 2008, and 2016, but there was no conservative candidate running for office.
    (No there wasn't a GOP conservative running in 1988, 2000, or 2004 either, just a worthless left moderate statist from the House of Bush.)
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo