Hillary Clinton Says America Has ‘Too Many Guns’

Posted by $ Your_Name_Goes_Here 9 years ago to Politics
76 comments | Share | Flag

I'm glad to see that she has not forgotten her old talking points. I hope that she soon gets back to the "vast right-wing conspiracy".


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by $ Susanne 9 years ago
    Actually... The guns are just fine... America has too many Hillary Clintons.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 9 years ago
    You know...the British said the same thing, back in Concord and we all know how THAT turned out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jetmec 9 years ago
    Having been born in England where the only way you can have a gun is illegally. Banning guns was the best thing the criminals could have wished for. All the guns are underground. So if guns are banned in the states all it means is you will pay more for them and ownership will go up!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChuckyBob 9 years ago
    Hillary needs to re-read Federalist Paper 46. I suspect, however, that she understands the concept, but would rather have a monarchy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago
    Old dino can clearly see he needs to hurry up and buy at least a couple of more guns.
    I'm in the process of stocking up on ammo for the guns I already have.
    Maybe I should also stock up on gasoline and (hick) plenty of easy to break wine bottles.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ProfChuck 9 years ago
    The greatest fear facing a tyrant is an armed populace. The government should fear the people not the other way around.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 9 years ago
    she is correct. only what she is avoiding saying is that they are in the hands of homeland security, the post office and every other agency of government that has no need of guns to do their jobs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree, actually. It's not. But, can we change it? Most say, "yes". I don't think we can.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago
    33,000 is cribbed from an incomplete wikpedia article. of that number 60 plus percent were suicides. the amount of weapons used in illegal or criminal acts was 11,000. The stated for use in defense was 55,000 and in the famous Clinton study over one million were reported. That study was quashed and people urged not to take the figures seriously as the Clinton study was flawed. Is this the same 1994 study on police and crime statistics that has never been fulfilled although it is required by federal law?

    The numbers also are duplicated. For example total killed with a weapon includes child deaths but child is a legal term meaning under 21.

    The figure also conveniently forgets gang on gang violence

    Hillarious Hillary's misuse of statistics is somewhere below the level of her misuse of required security regulations or put another way her intentional violations of laws is far more a danger to the country along with her disdain for the truth as ordinary people define the word.

    Truth we shouldn't ignore any problem but since the entire program was put in place by the left perhaps we can andshould ignore Hillary and the left wing socialist fascists whoever they are really for and and answering to in their organization.
    that's how you don't dangle two participles at once. .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 9 years ago
    We have too many power hungry politicians. We have too many Clintons. We have too many Bushes. A lot of things we have too many of but not guns. The free market will decide when we have too many.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Her quote was "I want you to know that we can’t ignore the Second Amendment and we can’t ignore the 33,000 people a year who die from gun violence." In October she suggested the Australia gun ban is “worth looking at” for gun policy in the United States.

    None of this sounds like respect for the Second Amendment to me.

    She is a political opportunist, who will say anything to gain power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years ago
    From three sentences later in the talk after this clip ends: "Look, there is a Second Amendment. There are Constitutional rights. We're not interested in taking away the guns of lawful, responsible gun owners."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Grendol 9 years ago
    She wants control and power. The ability of a people to resist with force is an affront to her desires for unresisted power, be it free speech, bearing of arms to resist tyranny, due process of the justice system to prosecute corruption, stopping her from rigging an electoral system or any other logical stop to her demands for power. If she was to come to power, one could only guess at the pretext and labels she would use for enabling herself to take political prisoners.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    As long as Hillary Wwotl or Waddle is not incarcerated we don't have enough weapons. Her election is prima facie the Pentagon should sound Boots and Saddles, Charge, and Deguello.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years ago
    Oh, when she gets elected you can be sure that we'll get sweeping, substantial gun "reforms". I only wonder what they'll call it. "The Safe Children Act"? "Domestic Peace Act". Who knows? Should be very entertaining.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 11
    Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years ago
    Where in the constitution or any law for that matter does it say how many guns Americans can have;...and...by what standards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    think about it. What does Hillary fear most? The Constitution and anything to do with followed by people who are independent thinkers and finally those who who have codes of ethics, morals, values and standards. Fourthly add 'all of them armed.'

    Who does that describe?

    "To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC......I take this oath freely without purposes of ecasion." Ring Ring Ring..

    But not if she can foment a revolution instead of a counter revolution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years ago
    This is great! Like Obama, she is giving a great boost to the gun industry!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo