

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Most peopple know the difference between private property and public property and that traveling in the wrong area is NOT a right granted.by the citizens themselves.
For the rest we have jail cells where they start off learning the meaning of 6' x 8'.
I especially like the way it's taught in the school yard whenm the school bulrly knocks over an intricately engineerd sand castle. and gets knocked on his as a result.. That shows some parent trained his kid right on how to throw and take a punch. Invariably that one will be vlass president in future years.
But then we have the liberal parent who immediately calls a lawyer while his or her kid grow up the one of life's punching bags and the kid grows up to be a congressional.
No leadership skills and still a punching bag.
to travel into my bedroom. . just as the right to free
speech does not imply that it's good to yell "fire!" in
a crowded theater, travel also has limits. -- j
.
Proof positive a need is not a right and is and some needs are created by wrong mmmm false premised lack of thinking.
In sum Government has no right to take that which it takes to merely to survive.Which should be the first, foremost and rule in setting up any kind of government funding system.
The Right To Survive costs therefore is a naural and not granted ban on what government may take not what the citizen must deduct.
A government that takes and pretends to give back is a totalitarian fascist organization to be rejected at all costs. Let them find their fodder responsibly just like anyone else. They deserve no more
A government that cannot take care of itself responsibly can certainly not take care of a country it's citizens.
I agree, but I prefer to call them goods and services. Commodities are non-differentiated. Gold is a commodity. You can't charge more for one type of gold b/c it's especially shiny or something. It's just an element. Those types of property you listed are differentiatable. Someone trying to sell you one of these things will do whatever they can to make it somehow special so you'll pay more. If the gov't provided them, it would treat them more like commodities than private vendors would.
Governments, on the other hand, exist in order to protect our rights. If they won't bother, then there's no reason to have them.
they have two things in common. All are fascist all put government and it's elitist ruling class over citizens of the country hell of the world.
It would make all rights tenuous, if the argument were valid. It's not valid, though, for the reasons strugatsky and blarman said.
If by 0.1% you mean a rare, fringe, or hypothetical case, I don't see it that way. It seems like the natural state for humankind is kings vs mobs, and we have to put energy into the system, in some form, to maintain liberty.
Load more comments...