Rule of law takes hit in court's order to commit perjury

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 11 months ago to News
37 comments | Share | Flag

'No tyrant could hope for a better tool than what is being made judicial precedent'
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/rule-of-la...

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 11 months ago
    Old dino is a retired state employee but If anyone for any stupid PC reason wanted me to affirm anything about Allah I have a card up my sleeve.,
    I swear Allosaurus = "different lizard" would just have to act out with the voodoo that only I can do.
    I'd be a-sayin', "Carnsarn it! Whut ther heck y'all want me ter affirm some silly mythical Arabic moon god fer? Ya'll a-tryin' ter sell me magic carpets or whut?"
    Then for Exhibit A evidence, I'd provide a hard copy of~
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah_a...
    If the prosecutor wants to talk about what offends Islamic scholars, I'd get all deflective and say I prefer a moon goddess.
    Should I be asked which moon goddess, I'd present Exhibit B and say, "Taker yer pick!"
    http://www.goddess-guide.com/moon-god...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 11 months ago
    Overstepping the Constitution. Flying in the face of a few thousand years of judicial practice.
    Just two of the myriad reasons that this PC crap is pure nonsense and should be fought to the nth degree.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Applying it to the case in question. It's a case where the jury itself had it not swallowed the judicial crap and forgot they were the judge the sitting judge is merely the referee should have returned a not guilty verdict IF there was a jury and IF they were not ordered to return a guilty verdict. and IF they were aware of basic rights, duties and repsonsibilities of citizenship.

    Pragmatic but it's not American way
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    An example to test the analysis.

    Heidi Fleiss. Charged with two separate crimes.

    Income Tax Evasion

    Pandering

    Taking the second one first one of the key participants was brought in as a witness. End of story no victim was produced. A participant is not a victim.

    The new story was that all women were victims. That was also unproven

    End of charge insufficient evidence to convict.


    Second the income tax. As a citizen I firmly believe income tax itself IS the crime. As a Jury member operating under the principle of a fully informed jurist I believe it's a way of not only finding justice but unjust laws.

    Verdict Not guilty on those particulars. It's another way of voting and juries are a part of the checks and balance system.

    As an example.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting thought:...Among the many fences are the one's that protect the Kakistocracy but not the People. Even prisons, I sometimes wonder if the fencing is to keep the outside world out and not the other way around...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It would seem...I am forced to think that the fall of Babylon and Rome was nothing in comparison.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 11 months ago
    Time to start ignoring all victimless federal laws. If one is to be found guilty regardless of actions, why not?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo