14

Bernie Supporter Asked Who Pays For His “Free College” on Live TV, Her Response Is Stunning

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 11 months ago to Culture
81 comments | Share | Flag

Another Ponzi Scheme.

I can barely pay for myself...what makes them think I can and should pay for everyone else?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by Bethesda-gal 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He might be lashing out against the Dem establishment because his wife Kathleen just lost her congressional primary race here in MD !
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by davidmcnab 8 years, 11 months ago
    Any significant scaling-down of military operations, especially with the military's supplier networks that charge $500 for a screwdriver and $2000 for a toilet seat, could finance a lot of things.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Suzanne43 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Right on! But for the most part, aren't we skipping the education and giving away diplomas now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The 8th grade test offered was for the most part a mix of what we received in 1958 some half century later.and what had already become senior high school material. Now that entire test would require a very advanced form of education to equal that available 100 years ago. No wonder the answer is I would use my calculator to scan and define those big words for a college student.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by XenokRoy 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So true, just look at the value of a High School Diploma now that everyone gets one.

    My oldest son had a buddy that went to "Landmark" which is the, you really did not cut it in High school but we want you to graduate anyway school.

    My Son took College level courses and graduated with only 1 semester to go for an associates degree with a 3.91 GPA.

    His friend took a 7th grade algebra class as a senior in which they only had to get 33% right on quizzes to pass the daily quiz. His grade was made up his pass/fails on the daily quiz. He graduated with a 3.87 GPA.

    Both the diplomas show the same high school as where they graduated from. Hard to see much a difference between the two on paper because we do not to leave anyone behind.

    It only stands to reason that if we provide college to everyone it would take the same course, allowing people to get a degree who really never earned it and then trying to say they are the same as those that did earn it.

    The result, the degree is valueless regardless of what was done to earn or not earn it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 8 years, 11 months ago
    Didn't this interview remind you of when Rearden's tumblers were clicking into place?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by cjferraris 8 years, 11 months ago
    About 150 years ago, the average person got the equivalent education to a 3rd grader if he was lucky. Urban kids were better educated if they didn't have to work, but most children only went to school during the winter and worked the fields during spring summer and early fall. As the Industrial Revolution went into full swing, the amount of education kids got started to climb. Fast forward to post WWII and by that time, most children had the opportunity for 9 months education during the school year. By the '60s, it started becoming common, and the ones who weren't going to school as adolescents were being called delinquents, or beatniks. By that time, if you had a high school diploma, you were VERY employable because at that time, you had the building blocks to gain the skills that were useable in the market place. As the economy gained traction, there was more of a demand for an "educated" workforce. More "specialized" degrees became available, thus creating the education bureaucracy. As with any bureaucracy, once it gets established, it will continue to grow on its' own and is like ivy, it ultimately destroys the thing it holds it in place.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 11 months ago
    How in the world do we get such dumb jerks into high office? What a sad reflection on the voters of Wisconsin. And the interviewer starts out by saying she's a smart woman? If she's what is ruled as smart, everyone in the Gulch is a veritable Einstein.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh now that makes sense. He's just a garden variety thief runing a very Gore-ing scam.

    But we now have the first nominee for Miss Stooopid 2016 to join that other idiot from last years sand box poopie pile contest. what did they call that 'safe tinkle spot?' that one was going to raid the rich and this one wants everyone's money.

    So what did we learn. The only cure for stupid requires a morturary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago
    Links been broken since yesterday...black screen labeled advertisement that's it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago
    To answer all of the comments they don't plan on putting their hands in your pockets. There's nothing there that Obama didn't steal.

    It will be a repeat of Cycle of Economic Repression Part I and the not starting iup Cycle of Economic Repression Part II. Inflation, devluation, debt repudiation and oh yaaassssssss about your pocket. they lied a third whack at the buying power of your retirement fund without COLA

    Suckers!

    At 30% each cycle if it follows the Great Recession version you can forget about retirement and may not be able to afford assisted suicide.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 11 months ago
    I think the proponents of free this and that should simply pay for it out of their own funds. I would have no problem with that , actually.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 8 years, 11 months ago
    Wouldn't it be easier for these socialists to sponsor a college student 100% including health needs, even if they can't afford to pay for their own? How about putting your money where your mouth is instead of your hand in someone else's pocket?

    When a person with experience meets a person with money, the person with experience ends up with the money and the person with the money ends up with the experience. I think that explains Sander's socialism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 11 months ago
    This woman was the Lieutenant Governor and this much of an absolute imbecile?

    PS - the reason Matthews is giving her a hard time about the source of the money isn't because he all-of-a-sudden had a lucid moment, but because he's a Clinton supporter trying to make a Bernie supporter look bad.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent point. Value comes from scarcity - not abundance!

    Very well said, indeed!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well said. Even my grade school kids are on Kahn Academy - especially for their math tutorials (which are quite good). My 8th grader is doing college-level calculus and software programming.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 8 years, 11 months ago
    A free college education is already available to anyone with a web browser and access to wi-fi.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 8 years, 11 months ago
    I cant believe that Chris Matthews asked such a direct question of a Democrat. Is he on drugs??? You are only supposed to question Republicans this way and you are definitely not supposed to follow up with a sneer like he did when she made such a ridiculous statement. You are definitely only supposed to sneer at Republicans. [Usually when they make sense!]
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo