14

Why NOT Believing In Conspiracies Is A Sure Sign Of Mental Retardation

Posted by UncommonSense 10 years, 11 months ago to Culture
45 comments | Share | Flag

This article is loaded with provable examples of actual conspiracies. I love the following sentences in the article:
"The idea, then, that there is no such thing as a conspiracy is flatly ludicrous. And people who condemn others as being “conspiracy theorists” only make themselves look mentally impaired.

To live in our modern world which is full of collusion and conspiracy — and yet somehow DENY the existence of any conspiracies at all — is an admission of a damaged brain."



All Comments

  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Jan, it happens so often nowadays that you should have built up callouses by now... :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by IndianaGary 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hmmm... I easily read 3-5 books a week and have done since I was 5 (I just turned 70.) My Kindle has over 200 books on it. As a software engineer I had to read constantly just to keep up. Now that I've shrugged, I read only for my own enjoyment.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zero 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah Robbie, you had me goin' for a minute.

    Agree or disagree, persons of good heart can always smile and move on!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Or they're better able to disguise the power that they really have so as to lull the masses into thinking that they have massive power, while showing that they have little power, but really exercising enormous power - ;-)

    And if I have to disclaim this as sarcasm, then you don't deserve my humor.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zero 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry, Rob, I was unclear. I menat to imply that Bush should have been able to "find" them (plant them) if the government was so very capable.

    I propose that persons in power have much less power than the average conspiracy theorist believes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, as for the WMD in Iraq, my theory is that they are buried in the desert or were shipped off to Syria. The one thing that is certain is that Saddam believed that he had them. It is less likely that they were moved and those who knew were silenced than it is that high ranking military would intentionally bluff Saddam into thinking that he had WMD. For sure he'd have their heads. The alternative is some low probability of facing sanctions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zero 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Couldn't agree more, Maph.
    This post concerns me greatly as it seems to be cruising through largely unopposed.

    Y'know, after the FOX special on the Apollo "conspiracy" I printed out a whole binder of websites de-bunking the show. Point by point, right down the line, couldn't be clearer. Left it in the break room at work. - Not a single "believer" changed their mind. Not a single one.

    And if "they" have so much power - if "they" can do damn near anything "they" want to us - how was it we never found WMD's in Iraq? That should have been an easy one.

    Of course neither point will convince anyone.
    I don't debate persons who find conspiracy everywhere - their logic is non-falsifiable.

    For me, it is much easier to believe a lone gunman killed Kennedy than a team of of Secret Service agents was turned.
    It is much easier to believe an Islamic terrorist attacked America than a conservative Texan.
    It is much easier to believe that scientists could, in-fact, send a man to the moon than the USSR helped fool the world that we won the Race to the Moon.

    Occam's Razor is not only famous - it's important.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 10 years, 11 months ago
    One interesting note in the article: "it’s hard to find a large institution (such as medicine, agriculture or the war industry) which isn’t involved in some sort of conspiracy at some level." The author seems to ignore the biggest source of all factual and proven conspiracies - our government!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, yeah, as a matter of fact I *did* think things couldn't get any worse, but on the music front, Lindsey Stirling's phenomenal, skyrocketing popularity gives me hope for the music, at least.

    And stop "outing" me; most people don't know I'm an Alien Anthropologist...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 10 years, 11 months ago
    "...greed, jealousy and a desire to dominate." THAT is "original sin"!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by woodlema 10 years, 11 months ago
    Have you ever played chess? Conspiracies are like chess. In fact very much like chess.
    How many moves ahead can you think of. What actions must occur before a strategic milestone is met where you launch another phase of a plan?
    With the vast majority of people being, to be quite honest..."Stupid" if you know anything about human nature you can manipulate public opinion to cause actions that allow long range policies to take place.
    "The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under
    the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist
    program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without
    knowing how it happened."
    When you plan over time, you slowly move people into who unknowingly submit to the changes they would normally be completely against.
    There are those in power, those who have been in office 30, 40 even 50 years, who use Government and long range strategic thinking to move this country straight toward Socialism and Communism so they can gain 100% control. This is done covertly. slowly.
    You cannot simply take Americans guns. But if you can gin up enough anger over a few incidents you can get people to start saying "We have to do something..." So the "leaders" create regulations and laws, and everyone is happy. Next time something happens, just like Obama said, never let a crisis go to waste. more laws and regulations, and before you know it BLAMMO!!! 100% gun control.
    Gun control is not about freedom, but about control. Gun control, Healthcare Laws, all these high sounding ideals, are about nothing but control. Read 1984. Watch the movie Captain America "Winter Warrior". Thos who claim no conspiracies are people who like to remain ignorant of reality and how those who have patience actually work.
    Americans have the attention span of a ferret on CRACK. Because this majority are so ignorant, they cannot see past the end of their nose. They do not see how in 1970, the housing bubble was started, how in the mid 1990's the housing bubble was accelerated all under the auspice of "fairness." No longer did people have to save 20% down, now they can get no-money down loans with no income verification, hence the sub-prime market was born. Bubble bursts, people cry "Something must be done.." Government acts and we have more government control. Rich get richer poor get poorer. What should have happened was to let the businesses who participated go bankrupt. Let the system reset. But that is not in line with Government gaining more control. The housing bubble was started by liberals in the 1970's during Carter, and expanded several times. It has taken 44 years for the government to gain this kind of control.
    Healthcare is the same. Another 4 or 5 years when people are screaming for "Something to be done" government will regulate more, pass more laws, all of which are meant to give more control to government and less freedom to the people.
    Conspiracies exits. They are all around us. You just have to open your eyes and look. Learn Chess, learn how to think 5 to 10 moves ahead..THEN you will see clearly what is being done TO you and me.


    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kittyhawk 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I personally like The Corbett Report. James Corbett may not get everything 100% right, but he strikes me as honest and intelligent, plus he provides a list of sources for each report and encourages you to do you your own research. http://www.corbettreport.com/

    There are very few in the mainstream media whom I trust, exceptions being John Stossel and Judge Napolitano.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hello flanap,
    Remember "Reading is fundamental"? My Mother belonged to a book of the month club. She couldn't wait for her new book at the beginning of each month and often purchased supplementary material. I try and read a minimum of two books a month. Many of today's pablum filled heads of mush seem unable to find time to read more than facebook, or twitter... what a waste.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sad to say, yes, Captain Sarcasm, you are correct. Being in communication with my favorite Alien Anthropologist, he said that as he observed the USA over the past century he thought it couldn't get any worse, then Teddy Roosevelt came along, and he thought it couldn't get any worse, and then Woodrow Wilson came along, and he thought it couldn't get any worse and FDR came along, then Nixon, then Clinton, and now Obama. He asked me, "Are there no depths to which the human race, with all its potential, cannot plunge?" I answered, "But, what about the art, the music, the glorious achievements?" He replied, "Have you seen the art and listened to the music as it is done today?" I had no answer.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DougJ 10 years, 11 months ago
    What was the term Rand gave to people that use their government influence to limit their competition and enrich themselves via gov't largess?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    She explained the concept many ways, but I don't see that she used the word. Here is her description form the Ayn Rand Letter:
    "It was business, not labor, that initiated the policy of government intervention in the economy (as long ago as the nineteenth century)—and business was the first victim. Labor adopted the same policy and will meet the same fate. He who lives by a legalized sword, will perish by a legalized sword."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I remember the thuggish “pull peddlers” that became very popular in Atlas Shrugged as the wall between government and economics shattered.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Relatively certain that it was "cronyism". The first time I heard Ron Paul use it, it struck me as being in Ayn's lexicon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wait! You mean the free market is not to be blamed for most of our troubles? We don't need more regulations? Washington is lying to us?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by highlander999 10 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Very well said, and that seems to be most of what Washington and the rest of the World Leaders seem to believe.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 11 months ago
    Sorry to be a broken record, but the greatest conspiracy of them all is the one going on in Washington destroying the USA from the inside out. I can no longer attribute any innocence in this regard to 90% of those so-called public servants.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo