How can a Marxist who spent his life reading Saul Alinsky be expected to provide any freedom? Which candidate calls for redistribution? Which candidate has agreeded to help the UN implement UN Agenda 21, which would change EVERY aspect of our lives, from taking away property rights, to controlling auto ownership, what foods we may eat (not meat), to how many children are "sustainable"? I have first hand account of law enforcement being asked if they are willing to use guns against US citizens to enforce UN Agenda 21. Obama is the only one who fits all the above criteria. Romeny may not be perfect, and was not my first choice, but he is more for free enterprise and US freedoms than is Obama.
Obama does not own his white side. He does not trust voters enought to be honest about his sexual orientation while in Chicago.If a man cannot be honest about himself, how can you trust him with your life and freedom. Atlas is already shrugging.

From my viewpoint the push for the viable third party has happened before with no successful results. I think the push has to be continuous on the republicans to become the party of small government. I think it is only through continuous pressure over a period of years that we will begin to move things back. We are talking about shaping the political philosophy of millions. That took time for the liberals to do and it will take time for us to take it back.

I understanding the lack of choice I personally am glad we have at least two candidates to choose from. I also believe we need at least 3 parties it is quite foolish to have only two and that has a lot to do why the status does not change.

I am still wondering if we will get an election and if so will it be honest. I expect riots and much civil unrest if Romney wins and that means we all lose even more freedom. That will not surprise many of us. I believe Obama would cost us everything if he gets re-elected and Romney would do the best of his ability given the insurmountable odds he will face.

I also expect the left to throw in as many monkey wrenches into the machinery before they leave. The are so greedy and self serving they have know idea that the country can't support them cradle to grave after all it has their leaders why not them?

To start promoting folks vote for anybody right before the election is suicidal for the country. I voted for Perot because I did not trust Mr.New World order or His plan to divide Israel among the terrorist nations. We know how that turned out my vote ended up being for the Slick Willey and that was even worst I think not sure though.

I do believe Romney is better than the Bushes and all the liberals either way. After this election there should be a major push for a viable 3rd party.

I could not agree more with you. I would love to have Johnson as a viable canidate. The democrats have moved so far to the left that they need to rename there party the national socialist party (and I am fully aware of the implication of the name)

I can see why Johnson is attractive and I'm not crazy about anything involving machine politics. But I don't think we are even dealing with a player in Obama who even deserves a seat at the American table, as his views are so excessively far to the left. If we have to deal with a two party system, I think the choice should be between Mitt Romeny and Gary Johnson as the Democrats should be eradicated from politics all together. They have shown what they stand for and any politician who speaks in favor of a "middle class" is one that wants to hold people down for political gain, and that is wrong. Nobody should aim to be in the "middle class" even if they are already there and never come out of it.

Thanks O.A.

I personally think we have to do it from within one of these parties. Why? Because for two decades that I have been involved in politics in my local area Libertarians have tried as a third party and failed. Why would I think that continuing that strategy would work at some point in the future? I see nothing changing there.

I think the tea party has forced Mitt Romney and other republicans to be a bit more for small government. Some more than others, or perhaps there is enough vote to get some truly small government guys in. Either way its having greater inroads than any other method we have tried to date.

Hello XenokRoy,

I agree. No matter how you slice it there are unfortunately only two viable possibilities for president this election cycle, Romney or Obama. No matter how much we would like another viable choice the reality is that one of these two will be our next president. The MSM will not even acknowledge the others or the problems their own lack of acknowledgement create. We need better choices and competition, just like we need free markets; we need fair competition in politics. If you live in a swing state or even one which is remotely close to a toss-up if you don’t vote for the lesser of the evils with a chance of winning you may be aiding in the election of the greater evil. I find many faults with both viable candidates, but I can’t live with knowing I helped continue the status quo. It would seem that letting one party remain in power after displaying such disdain for the capitalism that gave this nation the prosperity it has achieved will only embolden them for more destruction. Our demise has only been delayed, the destruction slowed to some degree because we keep threatening one party with replacement by the other. We must make what positive steps we can and try to influence through education and viewership/ ratings the MSM so they will give other candidates their proper due. Until we awaken the MSM and the masses to the facts we have all come to realize, namely that there is only a modicum of difference between the two parties and we deserve better choices, we will continue in this state. Of course the alternative is to try to correct the defects of one or both parties from within. I believe whether you agree with them or not, that is what the TEA party is trying. Give serious consideration to the congressional races and vote!
O.A.

Who do you think will rack up the most debt. Obama or Romney?

Which one will provide the greater freedom to the individual, Obama or Romney?

Like it or not those are the only choices we have. Pick the better and vote or you become part of the problem.

We are not going to undo the last 130 years of collectivism in the US overnight, to change things we are going to have to shift public thinking, particularly the politicians. If we can shift to a bit smaller government guy each time in our house, senate and presidential races our great grand kids may see the kind of freedom or great grand parents did.

I think it completely unreasoned to think we can reverse 130 years of damage in 10 years.

So you have said. It would be nice to see him get 5%, and then the Lib Party can drink from the public trough, too. (Of course, the mainstream media whores will still ignore them.) Harry Brown and Ron Paul explained that funding issue in past elections, too.

As I've said elsewhere, Johnson gets 5% of the 2012 vote, he earns matching funds for the Libertarian Party in 2016.

See Gary Johnson's Infowars interview where he breaks it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qu2fgftrw...
(That's right -- on my evil YouTube channel).

Sorry, I should have said "running with more than a snowball's chance in hell of being elected."
I do like chopped liver, too, though ;^)

What is Gary Johnson -- chopped liver?

Romney is a pandering looter. Obama is no better.

Harrumph, harrumph, harrumph. "We decimated the leadership in Afghanistan" says Oprahma. Woo hoo, if true, you reduced them by 10 percent! Wow! If the value of middle class' real estate had only been decimated on your watch!

War mongering puppets. Keep frightening the populace to enlarge their power and reduce our liberty. These two are NOT the good guys.

Balanced budget in 8-10 years? Bull. Clueless. Not with all the looting Romney wants to keep.

These two moronic nitwits don't know anything about free markets. They do flap their gums a lot, as if they did.

Agreed. Only wish there was a genuinely good, pro-liberty replacement running.

Ditto that x about a million.

I would like to see the destruction of the Obama Presidency............personally.

A glimpse into our possible futures.

Lots of boasting, fingerpointing, blame casting, claims to "take responsibility" (while doing/changing nothing whatsoever), and lies, plenty of lies. Same old politics, without representation.