Negative interest rates

Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 11 months ago to Economics
40 comments | Share | Flag

Now the EU banks have to pay to hold money.

All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hmmm. I thought that was called a pension - and technically, that would have been part of the compensation paid to you while you worked, but deferred to delivery after you were no longer working.

    I've heard of those places where you pay a pretty girl to get off your lap. Does that mean that if you let her stay it's free? ;-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You'll know it's coming when they start limiting the amount of money that you can withdraw at any one time (oh, yeah, they already do that - guess we're in deep doo doo).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would have said your attitude is nuts ten years ago --today, not so much.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Right now "mattressing" your money is OK, but soon we'll have significant inflation when you'll either want that money earning something to prevent erosion, or you'll want to purchase assets that don't depreciate very fast (and ideally Appreciate) as a means of storing your wealth.

    It seems to me that the "powers that be" have been depressing precious metals prices. This appears to have caused them to take on a negative aura - but I see this as the perfect time to stock up, slowly and unobtrusively. It's a crime that any capital gains on these stores of value will be taxed and subsequently a portion stolen by the very government that caused the erosion of the money that the precious metals guard against.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, it's not technically reducing the purchasing power, just transferring where the money exists.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, the few who think they can make better choices for the millions than the individual millions can make for themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, in this case, the "chasm" was on the verge of what some might actually advocate, so wasn't sufficiently absurd to be obviously sarcastic.

    I certainly don't give R's credit of having proper economic principles, and there are many C's whom I would question as well. The problem really is that they are politicians. Very few of them do what is right, but nearly all of them do what will get them re-elected.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 10 months ago
    hey Rob! I'm being paid by 3 outfits NOT to come
    to work. and it's because I was Virtuous! it's like
    the time I paid a woman, in Cicero (southwest chicago)
    Illinois, to get off of my lap. I told her that I was
    married. she replied, "Oh, can't get it up?" no
    offense meant;; none taken. professional
    agreement. it was 1976. she got $5. I got a
    "free" drink, mostly ice. -- j

    p.s. the "quantitative easing" process is our gov'ts
    way of doing this -- making all $$ cheaper, even
    the ones in the bank, and especially those under
    the mattress! that's why those on a "fixed income"
    find that it is not fixed, but decreasing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 10 months ago
    The ridiculously low positive (and now negative!) interest rates show you how seriously the looters take debt. We need an a series of ads for objectivist candidates that show our candidates cutting up the government credit cards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years, 10 months ago
    I met a woman who works for a foundation. By law, they must spend (give away) 5% of their holdings each year. But they cannot make 5% on their assets. So, this "free money" (zero interest; negative interest) is a constant drain with no inputs.

    If the central banks just gave everyone on Earth a billion dollars, the 8 quadrillion in new money would stimulate the world economy. You have to wonder what's holding them back...

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 10 years, 10 months ago
    Next comes the "bail in", where you are forced to pay your fair shaire through withdrawals directly from your account to the central bank... You're patriotic, aren't you?...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ever noticed how we (as a population) turn over "managing" the economy to people that have really no idea what they are doing with it... none, if any, in government have ever signed the front of a payroll check before.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We pretty much have that here... interest rate on a simple savings account is something like 0.10% and they hand a $5 / month fee or something with it. There isn't any incentive to keep money in a bank account.. you are better off spending or investing, or mattressing the money.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The "sar-chasm" is the gulf between the writer's intent and the reader's perception. We disagree here in the Gulch - you and I; and conservative and objectivists, in general - but we have always accepted that conservatives know their economic principles.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 10 months ago
    In 2011, I wrote in part "The fiscal insanity of the 20th and 21st centuries lies in the belief that, somehow, creating money will create wealth. It never has worked and never will work." The central banks cannot escape this insanity - If they stop creating money, the resulting depression will make the 1930s seem like a picnic. Negative interest rates remind me of the scene in the movie Gone With The Wind where Scarlett O'Hara whips the dying horse one more time and it collapses - so will the world economy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And this is because government busy-bodies think they can do a better job managing the economy than the billions of people making individual transactions in their own self-interest.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sure. Banks have been doing it to customers for a long time - just didn't call it that. Any fee that you've paid to a bank that held your money was in effect a negative interest rate (just doesn't vary based on amount, like this does).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, micro-managing is the only thing that does work (and by that I mean no regulation, each individual making their own decisions). What we currently have is Macro managing - the gov't making sweeping rules that prohibit/encourage various actions instead of individual action.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo