10

NYT How Did We End Up in a Low Growth World?: $#^@!

Posted by dbhalling 8 years, 8 months ago to News
82 comments | Share | Flag

The New York Times published one of their standard obscure, rambling articles entitled “We’re in a Low-Growth World. How Did We Get Here?” by Neil Irwin. The author rings his hands over the slow growth of the last 15 years and concludes that we (he) has no idea why we are in this situation, but if it does not change we are in for a gloomy 21st century. Click the link for the rest of the post.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by Mamaemma 8 years, 8 months ago
    Wow! Talk about short and to the point. Db, I long for a world resulting from the changes you put forward. Wouldn't it be wonderful?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 8 years, 8 months ago
    To a first approximation, return on investment is equal to annual cash flow divided by capital investment cost. When your annual cash flow is negative ...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Part of my point is that there are no "right" economists to ask. There are better economist, but none of them really know what causes economic growth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, but libertarians and so-called free market economists undermine inventors' property rights and other property rights.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 8 years, 8 months ago
    Three word answer for him...

    Government Market Interference


    Interference at all levels from conception through design, production, purchase, after purchase use.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 8 months ago
    Hello DB,
    They have no desire to ask the right economists. They are statists that refuse to see that government command and control, over regulation, and excessive taxes are inhibiting innovation, investment and business creation. They only listen to the Krugmans despite history.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 8 years, 8 months ago
    While invention is certainly the beginning of the chain, it takes a number of steps to develop the idea into a product and bring it to market. As each of these steps become harder to make, it is harder for the idea to become a product.

    The increasing regulatory burden on productive enterprise is slowing or discouraging the adoption of ideas. For example, the current regulatory environment has caused many people to avoid the medical device market, or the medical field altogether, even though it represents an area that most needs innovation.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo