I'm going to go ahead where you left off and make federal case out of it with it's own discussion thread. Civics class resumes

Not really we have a very large chunk of people who are voting for none of the above by not voting. In Political Science terms it's called the undervote and reflects the level of non participation or refusal of the existing choice or lack of confidence or sometimes just sheer laziness. In the not voting percentages it's found in 'didn't agree with issues or candidates' or 'in other' or both. Sheesh don't they teach civics anymore? Of course not to busy graduating sheep.

Klein vote for the most part. They don't mind at all if socialist fascism wins but seek to boost their green agenda in the public eye. if Klein does get a single delegate to the electoral college will she stand fast, trade it for Secretary of the Interior in competition with Johnson or just give it away. It's close enough that one electoral could make a difference. Johnson might get two or three. Depends on this winner take all business and the three states that don't use that system. But for sure it's ALL about electoral delegates the only one's that count. and pluralities don't win spit.

Hadn't for a while but did and sure enough the first graphs showed the entire left wing of poltics from for the most part. Two stood out one entitled a True View and the othe from woody.typepad. com. The rest were strictly left wing spectrum

It isn't. It's a objectivist site. We know no boundaries. As for the rest conservative and liberal are probably two of the most over used over re defined and useless words in the language as regards politics. They have no meaning worth bothering about .

The reason for Republicans be judged that way is they are left wing using the true center which is not the center of the left but in a Constitutional Republic is the Constitution at best they are the right wing OF the left. which nicely explains their nasty habit of caving.

Center therefore is for those who are Constitutionalists
Left is for Sociaists in varying degrees

Right is presently except for Anarchist way out there on the fringe of the right an area currently not in use but should be as it is the home of political power.

Divine RIGHT of Kings emananated from that and was graphically used by the French assemblies sitting the Kings representatives to the right.

Since we have no KING the definition from history of the citizens being the well spring of power and authority over government should be there or in the Center witih their Constitution instead of lap dogs of the left. Makes more sense than the current BS version and nicely configures and explains just about everything.

But conservative only useful meaning is those in power set in their ways want to keep it that way and take make changes slowly if at all. Sounds like Democrat/Republican Government over Citizens Coalition to me.

Liberals are those on the outside wanting immediate change now regardless of legality sometimes and are out of power. Well that's the citizens at this point. The rest is propaganda reframing, redefinition and media garbage.

Subjectivism stands alone as a non-collective group with simiilar interests and a similar philosophy but without losiing independent thinking and reasoning abiltities.

What you have is a flock of premises which are suspect from the get go. Treat them as such. Things get real clear very fast and that is the real treat!

Correct August of 1935 and it's orignal purpose was to ensure life for the destitute people who had lost everything in the depression years including any chance of a retirement income. It's now ensures looting privileges for near half the nation. Actiually it's 65,636,000 according to the SSA or 19% of the nation and that does not count

Welfare about one fifth of the population around 55-60 million. Those numbers often overlap with the first group. But my money says at least 25% draws one or more forms of welfare. Some would be destitute without it. Some of us would be living low on the hog if not moving in with the chickens.

Not everyone. 60,000 of us did not survive the Lyndon Butcher Johnson war. thanks for forgetting we're used to it.

It was! But why can't humor be a useful tool for independent thinking