"Man" banned from Princeton.

Posted by Government 8 years, 8 months ago to Humor
44 comments | Share | Flag

Students won't be punished for using it, but the world "man" is being removed from courses and school activities, being replaced by more gender-neutral terms.

Some may see this as an Orwellian side-step, unnecessarily blocking or destroying a useful term for the sake of political correctness. Others see it as a necessary state of evolution. Why, of course, do we use the word "man" to describe one gender and "wo-man" to describe the other. What's with the prefix? "Male" and "Fe-male" does the same thing. Seems like these words were created by men.

Using the words "man" and "woman" is still tolerated at Princeton and can still be used to identify gender, but the insidious imposition of the "man" term will be altered.

Here are some examples of what has changed. (pic related)

A memo from the school read “consistent with style guidelines issued by Princeton’s Office of Human Resources and Office of Communications, and as endorsed by the Institutional Equity Planning Group as a preferred University practice, HR has developed these gender inclusive style guidelines, to be utilized by all HR staff members in HR communications, policies, job descriptions, and job postings."

John Cramer, Princeton’s director of media relations, said the guidelines “reflect the university’s initiative of fostering an inclusive environment.”


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    oh, well ... "ain't" can be used by the politically correct;;;
    this is more like the inappropriateness of ni@@er! -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dekayz 8 years, 8 months ago
    So shouldn't we also ban "human" in favor of "huperson"? We can't allow hu-MAN! Oh, wait a minute, person includes SON. That excludes daughters. So... maybe let's just go with "beings".

    Seriously, do we have to wonder why we are spiraling around the drain when our colleges are training their students to think that this is something that is important?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 8 months ago
    I propose the rest of us refuse to use the biased words "Princeton University". From now on, we can call that place the "Northern New Jersey Safe-Space Asylum."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 8 months ago
    I think I'm being consistent when I say that I don't mind those terms since they don't distort meanings. However, I DO mind being told I must use those substitutions. So long as I am free to write what I want, in a style that I want, I'm OK with it. But my fear is that while Princeton says using the suggested words is optional, it is a harbinger of what's to come, eventually, the use of man will be the same as the use of ain't.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 8 years, 8 months ago
    I could not open the article, however; STUDENT; A PERSON WHO IS UNDERGOING A COURSE OF STUDYAND INSTRUCTION! source Oxford Universal Dictionary. These "so called' students should be more concerned about getting an education than offering their own very stupid actions as this represents. But this is what happens when education is destroyed by government, you get stupid people who are referred too as students. But what are they students of? BLANK
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 8 years, 8 months ago
    I'm with CG. I use "gentlepeople" when writing email to multiple genders. Seems correct.

    On the other hand making a big deal out of it is fixing a non-problem, and making a big deal out of nothing. Better to just leave it alone and let the issue die on its own.

    Men and women should be treated equally, but some of this is just dumb. There are differences in size, strength and some of the ways we think. The differences are real and should be celebrated. More "rightspeak", getting ahead of what is known, is just government intrusion. I will accept this crap when Title 9 is withdrawn and men and women compete in athletics, heads up. Until then, stay out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snakecane 8 years, 8 months ago
    Man oh man, I don't know what to make of all this. I wait with baited breath for an Office of university self-esteem, or a government Department of Self-esteem about not hurting anyone's feelings or it's prison for you, buster. A Department of Niceness? Office of Correct Words? I wonder what the Nazis called their government department that dealt with the murder of Jews?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ SarahMontalbano 8 years, 8 months ago
    The fact that this is being imposed on Princeton educators is a restriction on whatever freedoms they had left. But as CircuitGuy stated, the norms were already going that way and it wouldn't have been long before teachers were doing it by themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 8 months ago
    Hey, man, that jive wouldn't fly back in the 60s for dudes n' dudettes. Me dino no man with a plan but, man, guys weren't hip to such downers, man.
    We were free, see. Freeeeeeeeee!
    Man, who the freak wants to watch what he says all the time?
    Man, might as well clasp a ball n, chain to your tongue and go "ayaya ayaya" all the time while drooling all over the place.
    Man, guys never thought to feel girly so to go scare women in the ladies room either.
    So, man, just get outta here with that thought police sh*t! Just want to be able to chill. Dig?
    Man, I just wanna chill. Chillllllll,baby!l Woo!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by awebb 8 years, 8 months ago
    I saw something on Fox News last week about a college (in Minnesota I believe) that wants to ban the phrase "you guys".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course. I expected nothing less and certainly nothing more. quickly. Few and several define them the time clock is ticking.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 8 months ago
    Hello Government,
    I intend to go on offending as much as possible along those lines. They can pry those words from my cold dead lips. Big whiners and cry babies... Gee did I hurt their little feelings? Good grief! Maybe they need their diapers changed...
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -4
    Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 8 months ago
    I have been using the words on the right-hand column for ages. I don't see anything insidious about using either one. Consider "average man". I would only say that if I were talking about an issue that only applies to men. If I'm talking about something gender neutral, it's potentially confusing to say it the old-fashioned way.

    English is losing the distinction between "like" and "as" and the distinction between "less" and "fewer". I'm sorry to see those go. But abandoning the use of man to mean men and woman makes logical sense to me.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo