There is no such thing as "The Obama Doctrine." President Obama only stands in for the people who continue the policies of the previous administrations. Clinton was a Bush president, which is why they could travel around together after their terms of office. I agree that with different players - Hillary Clinton; Michelle Bachman; whoever - the details of what gets traded for what will change. However, the larger field of operations is constant.
" It is sad but true that a strong (inhumane) ruler like Saddam Hussein or Jozip Broz (Marshall Tito) of the former Yugoslavia is all that holds such tribalists in a nation. "
Let's hear it; three cheers for multiculturalism!
If I were President, then the USA would still be the military ruler of Iraq,and there would be no targeting of Americans.
But you guys keep voting for nice guys who tell you what you think you want to hear.
Harry Turtledove's "The Last Article" outlines the methods we should have used in Iraq, Afghanistan and the entire middle east.
The wikipedia entry is distorted by typical modern blind political correctness, but it gets the essential facts correct. (Except, Model didn't perpetrate the Qtub road massacre; Ghandi did.)
Part of what it misses is Model's motivation, as a professional soldier...
When Ghandi leads the Qtub road march, and the Wehrmacht soldiers fail to stop it, Field Marshall Model goes to Qtub road. While arguing with Ghandi, he drops his handkerchief part way to the waiting soldiers and their machine guns. He tells Ghandi that if any of his people pass that point, he washes his hands of them. Ghandi snidely asserts that he is quoting Pilate:
"Pilate washed his hands to evade responsibility," the field marshall answered steadily; he was in control of himself again. "I accept it; I am responsible to my Fuhrer and to Oberkommando-Wehrmacht for maintaining Reich control over India, and I will do what I see fit to carry out that obligation."
What happens after the massacre... Model chastises the soldiers who failed to break up the march, and laid the blame for the death and suffering at their feet; had they done their job, they would have broken up the march and nobody would have had to have been shot. He then requires them to put the wounded out of their misery as penance.
Another important point; Ghandi and Nehru listen to the radio in hiding to hear the expected repudiation of Model by the German government. Imagine their dismay when they hear the government not only commend Model, but warned that responses to any more such disobedience will be worse.
When Gandhi calls a general strike, Model determines that the railroads are most needed back in operation, so he sends squads to every twentieth house of the railway workers, pulled them out and had them shot. Pretty soon, they began returning to work.
Part of the last conversation between Model and Ghandi:
Model refused to be baited. "We do what is right for our volk, for our Reich. We are meant to rule, and rule we do - as you see."
While I know many, if not most of you feel the United States should put its figurative balls on the shelf and huddle on the east coast of this continent, pretending to be "equal" to everyone else out there, some of us are not willing to see history repeat in the streets of our home towns. We needed to go into the middle east and clean house long ago. Agreed, Iraq is a convenient political fiction; it should have been made a British protectorate at its creation; a colony whose existence was for the benefit of the British, not the Arab Moslems. Instead, the British played politics with their collective consciences, which is always a recipe for disaster.
"The true preventative is a culture of reality and reason. You do not get that with a military victory."
Speak for yourself. *I* do. The Romans did, before they became multicultural. The British did, before they became multicultural. The present Japan is a creation of our military victory.
Objectivism, like most ideologies, only works within the context of a given culture and society. Out there in the real world, one might presume to force lions to lay down with lambs and live in harmony.
Cheney shouldn't have had to say shit about WMDs. If the left weren't full of such influential cowards, the fact that he fired on our warplanes and violated the armistice was enough; but no, the cowards and moral equivocators and downright traitors didn't care about what had to be done until they thought maybe someone might say the word "nuke" three times and beetlejuice might appear.
Please explain to me exactly what security for the people rebuilding Iraq *should* cost; while you're at it, please provide a cost-analysis of rebuilding a country's infrastructure that has been allowed to go to pot for years before the invasion.
This isn't about blood-for-oil. This is about crushing our enemies.
No, Rich, see the video posted under "New Domino Theory". Dick Cheney correctly identified in 1994 what the outcome would be - and then went ahead and did it anyway. I agree that he is technically competent but he is actually a driver of the so-called "Obama Doctrine."
Hillary's vote doesn't infuse me with a lot of confidence. I'm not sure what she's ever added to a discussion or debate. And I still believe the intelligence was faked to justify the invasion. Yeah, the situations worse - that's Obama's full intent. He hasn't really hidden that goal.
Mistakes were made by both administrations Zen but even Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq war. The invasion was justified with the intelligence we had. I didn't like the nation building stuff. Completely withdrawing and signaling that we have no intentions of intervening is clearly worse judging from the current situation.
Ahh, Darth Vader speaks again. The man who spoke the loudest and pushed the hardest for the WMD Nuclear threat from Saddam. And the man who made sure that his company and all of his crony buddies raked all the profits they could from open ended contracts with outrageous costs and profits. Yes Obama is taking the US down a notch, really more than a notch, but Cheney and his crew began it with the insanity that we could turn the middle east into some type of democracy and have a safe haven from which to control the future of that area.
Both administrations are the worst events this country has ever had to face and we'll pay for it for years into the future. As soon as we stop listening to the kind of evil fools we've had in administrations for most of the last century, the sooner we'll have a chance for this country to once again become the envy of the world.
Dick Cheney served as White House Chief of Staff, Secretary of Defense, had a successful career in the private sector and was Vice President. I don't think that someone no longer seeking political office would simply be "posturing" and he is clearly one of the most qualified people to speak on this issue. If non intervention is the answer then why did Obama intervene in Libya? Muammar Gaddafi didn't pose a direct threat to the US and was the type of leader you said brought stability. It appears that Obama wants chaos in the Middle East and that is what we have. If we were working toward true energy independence I could understand it but his strategy or doctrine is frighteningly dangerous.
I have a letter of thanks from Lynn Cheney. I sent her a note after listening to an interview with Terri Gross of NPR's "Fresh Air." That being as it may, this article by Dick Cheney in the WSJ critical of President Obama is just political posturing.
ISIS and Al Qaeda are not allies: "A U.S. counterterrorism official called the al-Qaeda announcement “unprecedented” and said Zawahiri had been left with “little choice but to announce a rupture that, for all intents and purposes, had already taken place.” But despite the weight the al-Qaeda brand still carries among jihadists worldwide, the official said, ISIS “has never been dependent on AQ core for resources or direction, so the tangible impact of the decision may not be that significant.” The official was not authorized to discuss the matter on the record." -- http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/midd...
"Clashes this year between al Qaeda’s official Syria wing, the Nusra Front, and the franchise’s disowned offspring, The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), has killed hundreds of fighters and displaced tens of thousands of civilians." -- http://weaselzippers.us/185941-al-qaedas... (Note that this was a Reuters story.)
This is a religious war between militants of two Islamic sects. It is sad but true that a strong (inhumane) ruler like Saddam Hussein or Jozip Broz (Marshall Tito) of the former Yugoslavia is all that holds such tribalists in a nation.
The true preventative is a culture of reality and reason. You do not get that with a military victory. If the USA were still the military ruler of Iraq, instead of fighting each other, these factions would be targeting Americans - which is what they did. With the USA gone, the reality cannot be evaded that Iraq is not and never was a nation, but a fiction of Britain's punishment of the Ottoman Empire for its support of Germany. ... that and the desire for fueling depots for its then-new oil (not coal) powered navy.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Let's hear it; three cheers for multiculturalism!
If I were President, then the USA would still be the military ruler of Iraq,and there would be no targeting of Americans.
But you guys keep voting for nice guys who tell you what you think you want to hear.
Harry Turtledove's "The Last Article" outlines the methods we should have used in Iraq, Afghanistan and the entire middle east.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_A...
The wikipedia entry is distorted by typical modern blind political correctness, but it gets the essential facts correct. (Except, Model didn't perpetrate the Qtub road massacre; Ghandi did.)
Part of what it misses is Model's motivation, as a professional soldier...
When Ghandi leads the Qtub road march, and the Wehrmacht soldiers fail to stop it, Field Marshall Model goes to Qtub road. While arguing with Ghandi, he drops his handkerchief part way to the waiting soldiers and their machine guns. He tells Ghandi that if any of his people pass that point, he washes his hands of them. Ghandi snidely asserts that he is quoting Pilate:
"Pilate washed his hands to evade responsibility," the field marshall answered steadily; he was in control of himself again. "I accept it; I am responsible to my Fuhrer and to Oberkommando-Wehrmacht for maintaining Reich control over India, and I will do what I see fit to carry out that obligation."
What happens after the massacre... Model chastises the soldiers who failed to break up the march, and laid the blame for the death and suffering at their feet; had they done their job, they would have broken up the march and nobody would have had to have been shot. He then requires them to put the wounded out of their misery as penance.
Another important point; Ghandi and Nehru listen to the radio in hiding to hear the expected repudiation of Model by the German government. Imagine their dismay when they hear the government not only commend Model, but warned that responses to any more such disobedience will be worse.
When Gandhi calls a general strike, Model determines that the railroads are most needed back in operation, so he sends squads to every twentieth house of the railway workers, pulled them out and had them shot. Pretty soon, they began returning to work.
Part of the last conversation between Model and Ghandi:
Model refused to be baited. "We do what is right for our volk, for our Reich. We are meant to rule, and rule we do - as you see."
While I know many, if not most of you feel the United States should put its figurative balls on the shelf and huddle on the east coast of this continent, pretending to be "equal" to everyone else out there, some of us are not willing to see history repeat in the streets of our home towns.
We needed to go into the middle east and clean house long ago. Agreed, Iraq is a convenient political fiction; it should have been made a British protectorate at its creation; a colony whose existence was for the benefit of the British, not the Arab Moslems. Instead, the British played politics with their collective consciences, which is always a recipe for disaster.
"The true preventative is a culture of reality and reason. You do not get that with a military victory."
Speak for yourself. *I* do. The Romans did, before they became multicultural. The British did, before they became multicultural. The present Japan is a creation of our military victory.
Objectivism, like most ideologies, only works within the context of a given culture and society. Out there in the real world, one might presume to force lions to lay down with lambs and live in harmony.
Please explain to me exactly what security for the people rebuilding Iraq *should* cost; while you're at it, please provide a cost-analysis of rebuilding a country's infrastructure that has been allowed to go to pot for years before the invasion.
This isn't about blood-for-oil. This is about crushing our enemies.
Both administrations are the worst events this country has ever had to face and we'll pay for it for years into the future. As soon as we stop listening to the kind of evil fools we've had in administrations for most of the last century, the sooner we'll have a chance for this country to once again become the envy of the world.
ISIS and Al Qaeda are not allies:
"A U.S. counterterrorism official called the al-Qaeda announcement “unprecedented” and said Zawahiri had been left with “little choice but to announce a rupture that, for all intents and purposes, had already taken place.” But despite the weight the al-Qaeda brand still carries among jihadists worldwide, the official said, ISIS “has never been dependent on AQ core for resources or direction, so the tangible impact of the decision may not be that significant.” The official was not authorized to discuss the matter on the record." -- http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/midd...
"Clashes this year between al Qaeda’s official Syria wing, the Nusra Front, and the franchise’s disowned offspring, The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), has killed hundreds of fighters and displaced tens of thousands of civilians." -- http://weaselzippers.us/185941-al-qaedas... (Note that this was a Reuters story.)
This is a religious war between militants of two Islamic sects. It is sad but true that a strong (inhumane) ruler like Saddam Hussein or Jozip Broz (Marshall Tito) of the former Yugoslavia is all that holds such tribalists in a nation.
The true preventative is a culture of reality and reason. You do not get that with a military victory. If the USA were still the military ruler of Iraq, instead of fighting each other, these factions would be targeting Americans - which is what they did. With the USA gone, the reality cannot be evaded that Iraq is not and never was a nation, but a fiction of Britain's punishment of the Ottoman Empire for its support of Germany. ... that and the desire for fueling depots for its then-new oil (not coal) powered navy.