Amazon Deletes Negative Reviews Of Shillary's Book, "Stronger Together"

Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 7 months ago to Politics
53 comments | Share | Flag

Amazon's CEO owns "The Washington Post."
So there ya go. Category?
Put this puppy in politics, old dino sez.
When you click the link to read the article, do pause to contemplate a photo me dino hereby entitles as "A Loving Embrace Of Corruption."


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for speaking your opinion to the hitlery youth at Amacensor.
    I cut back my purchases from Amazon some time ago, and curtailed them even more when they forced sellers not to sell anything with Lincoln's War against states rights' confederate images on them. They are part of the thought police. They also don't allow sales of firearms, ammo, liquor, cigarettes, or eyeglasses. At least the fedgov hasn't forced them to sell things they don't want to sell... yet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    how about amazon saying "the following comment we believe to be of less value and therefore have marked it..."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by cjferraris 8 years, 7 months ago
    I went to Amazon and there were just under 2K reviews. I suspect Hillary supporters will love it and everyone else will either hate it, or just go "meh"... I don't think it will change ANYONE'S mind for liking the book, however, I think the thinking person will start to question how the give-aways will actually work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's been about 2 hours now and Amazon has not posted but I (positively) reviewed another book 15 min. ago and they approved that!

    Proof, their workin for hiltery
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChuckyBob 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A wise man once said (I think it was Will Rogers) "Diapers and politicians should be changed often...and for the same reason."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sure their not Used??? might be hill and billeries, donated back in their banjo playen times...eeeee!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ nickursis 8 years, 7 months ago
    I get a lot from Amazon, and I use their reviews, as usually they indicate something useful, like "I took the damn thing apart and it exploded" or some other neat fact. I disregard any reviews for movies or books, because when you look at it, it is always garbage like "How wonderful" a movie is, or a book, that has yet to be released. Everything is manipulated, and it is impossible to find just plain, factual truth. And when it comes to the Beast, it isn't even a consideration.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ive only requested removal for the one where they admit having never read my book before dumping on it. It such a small number but its the point of the matter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As far as good reviews == "good for amazon": not necessarily. Amazon still benefits if you buy a different book/product from their site instead. They also benefit if negative reviews prevent you from having a bad experience with a product because it increases the customer confidence level of their ranking and recommendation system - which leads to more sales overall.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TheRealBill 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I mostly agree, but they should flag for review phrases like "I didn't read this but.." regardless of the rating or "verified" purchase status. I also think a flag for "not reviewing the product" would be quite helpful.

    Regardless of content, Amazon has a financial interest in the reviews/rating being helpful. At least being able to filter out and/or "reviews" which are not abut the product would enhance the quality of the system.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChuckyBob 8 years, 7 months ago
    My son and daughter-in-law buy new diapers for their young son on Amazon. I had no idea that Amazon was selling used diapers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 7 months ago
    Amazin' Amazon!
    I buy my underwear there. It's cheaper even including the shipping. One of their interesting retailing perks are customer reviews. If that cannot be trusted, then it puts into doubt anything else they may claim. Including the underwear.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 8 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Shine a flashlight on a question of credibly and cockroaches duck.
    Doesn't always work that way anymore.
    The lefty media now use corrupt flashlights that just do not shine on corrupt lefty politicians.
    Just ask the grateful Liar-In-Chief.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 7 months ago
    Doesn't Amazon have a financial interest in having more good reviews on every product? They are in the business of selling the products and are chipping the pot on every sale. No sales, no income for Amazon.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo