

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
But.
If I had a culture to design (kinda like a 'paint by numbers' design-a-culture kit) and I had a lot of extra APC's and stuff and I had a lot of ex-military turned law enforcement who knew how to use them (knew 2 such) and I WAS SURE THEY WERE ON MY SIDE...
Then it might be nice to contemplate an America that upped the ante of Yamamoto's putative saying "You cannot invade the mainland US. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." to "...There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass and an APC behind every tree, staffed by organized war veterans."
OK. This is dreamland. But it is a good dream. If these vehicles were not the 'hammers' that beg to be used against every thumbtack that is reported to Law Enforcement, then the dispersal of military weaponry amongst the civilian population would be an advantage, not a liability.
Jan
(Yes, I know that there is no written substantiation for Yamamoto having said that. But it does sound very much like him, does it not?)
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
The Browser Hijacker Object in Chief
"If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail" --Abraham Maslow.
It does seem that some in the ranks of power are finally coming around to the utter failure of the approach used for 50 years to try to address drug usage.
That said, the overall issue addressed in the article is that of the over-arming of our local police forces. Does this lead to a Rambo effect where they feel the need to carry out SWAT type actions where a simple knock on the door with a warrant would suffice?