

- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
"If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail" --Abraham Maslow.
hierarchy, the order of elements flips ... check out
how the excesses occur among the successful !!! -- j
experimenting with the bottom of the stack --
food, shelter, "intimacy" with "family", etc....... -- j
He described the self-actualized person as needing very few people and having only a few good friends.
The character Howard Roark in The Fountainhead is a very good example of a self-actualized person.
Either you have been taught something that isn't true or your understanding of self-actualization isn't correctly defined. IMHO.
the National Management Association's certification
course ... and we came up with a few wrinkles,
including this one. just looking at those who seem
to be in the self-actualization stage (like me),,, the
desire for good food, housing, family and friends
is magnified -- I've quit smoking and gotten fatter,
with my wife built a house of some excellence,
gotten closer with my family and aspired to be
more and more like Howard ... Roark or Hughes!
and I can count my very close friends on one hand.
IMHO, as well. -- j
Maslow was one of the theoreticians;;; while there
are several others who are more "comprehensive",
his is easy to understand and reasonably pertinent
to enough people and situations to help in our
understanding of the subject. a good url is:::
http://psychology.about.com/od/theorieso...
we can start a post, but I would suggest that we
include others (McClelland, Taylor, Herzberg, Mayo ...)
if we want to explore. or, we could just start with
something like "what motivates you?" -- like my
favorite close-in friend question, "What do you live for?"
Thanks, y'all !!! -- j
only child ... ummm, has all the children in the
family ... one of whom is super, and we're working
on the other one.
may the bluebird of happiness fly in your sunroof,
with good news someday about your family!!! -- j
only child..." how's that work, john? ;)
loving atheist at age 15, while my sister stayed true
and even went to the prestigious women's college
in atlanta where mom had gone. persona non grata
in the family -- that's me!!! -- j
couldn't take it anymore. came back to ktown and
got a commercial art degree (with my encouragement).
now, she's working with Aspergers kids and still has
the extraordinary touch of a free-hand artist. -- j
Tennesseeans at the Alamo, and take my Buck
knife plus my Daisy bb gun down to the texas
border to defend the homeland. Dan'l Boone,
Davy Crockett, hyar I come!!! -- j
It's the way *the people* have changed. The willingness with which they now surrender sovereignty over their lives. Their ignorance of even recent history.
I still say we were set up for this in the 70s. When gas prices spiked, and Carter emasculated us, telling us to get used to being just another country, to be content with less, etc. It was then that quality went out the window, in every meaning of the word. It was in that same era that the old-fashioned western view of "honor". Self-respect has become, instead of a necessity of life, a frivolous luxury. Shame has become a dirty word. Where once it was a signal of failure, of dishonor, of unworthiness of respect, now it's a PC code word. No longer is shame a tool to coerce positive behavior in the one feeling shame. It's now a weapon to hurl at whoever or whatever is making One feel shame. It's the person, situation, or object making One feel shame that is bad, not the One. Notice I put "One" in caps. People today are full of hubris, particularly those least deserving of hubris. Full of self-importance for no greater reason than their ability to avoid the abortionist's knife and get themselves born (granted, quite an accomplishment in today's culture). And they are taught this self-importance... this UNEARNED self importance, from cradle to grave.
It is this failing of character that A) makes the current situation possible in the U.S. and B) makes the current situation so very, very dangerous for the survival of individual liberty and civilization itself.
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/19/aw-c...
couldn't find the exact quote, but I will !!! -- j
p.s. Kaila did !!! youTube right here -- Thanks!!!
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
The Browser Hijacker Object in Chief
as we extremist founder-worshipers assault the
bulwarks of progressivism. -- j
It does seem that some in the ranks of power are finally coming around to the utter failure of the approach used for 50 years to try to address drug usage.
That said, the overall issue addressed in the article is that of the over-arming of our local police forces. Does this lead to a Rambo effect where they feel the need to carry out SWAT type actions where a simple knock on the door with a warrant would suffice?
I used to love this show back in the beginning, with Michael Moriarity as the assistant D.A. He was a paladin for justice, in those days. His character believed in The Law, and didn't believe in overstepping it just to get a conviction.
They got rid of him, and replaced him with a cast of increasingly morally ambiguous characters.
As some here know too well, I got to watching Law and Order SVU, mostly because I like watching Mariska Hargitay (side note: Jane Mansfield's daughter...)
And I was appalled at the overstepping of authority that not only took place, but was considered morally acceptable and even mandatory. Witnesses, bystanders, even victims blackmailed and coerced into dancing to the police and/or DA's tune. Presumption of guilt, and therefore justification of massive rights violations. The protagonists of these stories would have been villains or crooked cops in tv series or movies of the past. I'm sorry, but I just can't liken modern cop dramas with "Adam-12" or "Dragnet". Those old shows might be corny, but at least they respected and honored the rule of law.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095444/plot...
But we make a mistake in blaming this on BO. It's the LEO mentality of control and threat.
But.
If I had a culture to design (kinda like a 'paint by numbers' design-a-culture kit) and I had a lot of extra APC's and stuff and I had a lot of ex-military turned law enforcement who knew how to use them (knew 2 such) and I WAS SURE THEY WERE ON MY SIDE...
Then it might be nice to contemplate an America that upped the ante of Yamamoto's putative saying "You cannot invade the mainland US. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass." to "...There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass and an APC behind every tree, staffed by organized war veterans."
OK. This is dreamland. But it is a good dream. If these vehicles were not the 'hammers' that beg to be used against every thumbtack that is reported to Law Enforcement, then the dispersal of military weaponry amongst the civilian population would be an advantage, not a liability.
Jan
(Yes, I know that there is no written substantiation for Yamamoto having said that. But it does sound very much like him, does it not?)
defensive hardware, as well as marksmen as well
as markswomen (watch out -- they're deadlier!).
and my '77 Jeep might double for an APC ... so,
why all the FEMA stuff? if they are on our side? -- j
defensive hardware, as well as male marksmen as well as female marksmen (watch out -- Mandatory PC disclaimer about female dominance!). "
FIFY.
different from the one which has been orchestrated
by the current regime. strange dichotomy of
Topsy-type growths from the tree of fascism ... we
right-wing extremists will have to vote to stunt its
growth. -- j