As a college educated female, I have never asked who endorsed whom to dictate for whom I would vote. I do my own homework! Do I care what "Mr Dilbert" does, or Ryan, and certainly not McCain! I would never throw my vote away to Johnson, he is an unniformed flake (I am from N. M.), and he has no strong group of people to put in place who do know what he lacks. I would never vote for Hillary, she is as crooked as they come and would stack the Supreme Court.making bjectivism impossible. These people squawking the loudest, are probably guilty of things far worse them what Trump said 11 years ago. I know politicians who are definitely in that category, and it is par for the course in Hollywood. Don't be fooled that this goofy sexual harassment movement has changed anything, it has not. Only strong females with a demand for respect can change it. Hillary is not one of them, she is a crude, nasty weak woman, who bows to Bill's every scheme.

Very entertaining, and it has gems like this one:
"you can ignore all of it because reason is not part of decision-making when it comes to politics."

Objectivism + Politics = Frustration

I transcribed an excerpt from Scott Adams' book in this post: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
He talks about how selfishness is a good thing, stuff that sounds inspired by Ayn Rand.

Why He Endorsed Trump - changing from Clinton to Trump.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/15091941...
"Fairness isn’t an objective quality of the universe. I oppose the estate tax because I was born to modest means and worked 7-days a week for most of my life to be in my current position. (I’m working today, Sunday, as per usual.) And I don’t want to give 75% of my earnings to the government. (Would you?)"

"And being chummy with Putin is more likely to keep us safe, whether you find that distasteful or not. Clinton wants to insult Putin into doing what we want. That approach seems dangerous as hell to me."