For Your Information...
I find this Totally Unethical.
Regardless of whether anything is bad or good, it should be identified by exactly what it is. Calling it something different degrades the free market process...and maybe that's the point?
Regardless of whether anything is bad or good, it should be identified by exactly what it is. Calling it something different degrades the free market process...and maybe that's the point?
It's a bloodtype joke...
https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops...
"The U.S. sugar program uses price supports, domestic marketing allotments, and tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) to influence the amount of sugar available to the U.S. market. The program supports U.S. sugar prices above comparable levels in the world market."
In other countries (and increasingly in the U.S.) sugar is the preferred sweetener. That's why Pepsi now offers a popular version sweetened with sugar instead of HFCS, and why Coca-Cola imported from Mexico is also gaining popularity.
If the U.S. restores a free market in sugar, this whole issue will go away. As it should.