The left doesn't care, they are all frauds anyway, either that or they just don't care but most probably, with all things, just not aware.

For the rest of us...Many find it hard to believe that just such a thing could actually occur.

No outrage over the birth question but plenty over the fact that Trump is not doing the daily Intel briefings as many before him have. I think the same reason for both. Being briefed on intelligence by those who are BHO's lackys is about as valuable as digging into the birth issue as long as they are still there shredding the evidence. Right now the case could be presented with irrefutable proof and Loretta Lynch would squash it. After January 20th all bets are off but keep in mind the shredder is running at full throttle as we are speaking and if you thought Killeries lost 33,000 emails was a big deal fasten your seat belts.

Maybe not. Hasn't it occurred to you that this becomes a discoverable fact in any lawsuit against any federal program Obama signed into law? Why, in fact this becomes grounds to challenge every appointment he ever made.

Little late for this. Maybe a documentary when there are no government officials to block it.

0 became a part of the elite system that exists in dc. so he is protected like the c group.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsydq... no difficulty authenicating the fraud.

On Obama's birth certificate, there was evidence of what are called "anti-forensics" to make it more difficult to authenticate.

You evidently haven't seen the video and the proof it contatins. It shatters all the phoniness of Obama.

The scene of Hillary championing truth is more than I can imagine..

What do you think would be more effective?

That underscores nothing except that Obama may have produced a valid birth certificate, after stonewalling for several months. He hardly did a "decent job" unless you like Obamacare and the mess he managed to make worse in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. And I suppose that Benghazi, IRS targeting of conservative groups, and Fast and Furious don't qualify as scandals in your book. Really?

Obama was not on the ballot this year, and Hillary probably would have been ecstatic to see more outrage over his birth certificate and less outrage about her corruption. If even a little outrage had been redirected from Hillary to Obama, she would probably be president-elect now.

That is the first place to start and the Sheriff has the goods.

"News" outlets sell outrage, but it doesn't mean it's suitable for any particular purpose. The birther thing says more to be about the news outlet making make the claim than about anything else.

If we imagine for a moment there were some truth to it, which is absurd, his critics would be on him for technicality. That just underscores President Obama did a decent job and had no scandals, so people paid to whip out outrage literally have to make stuff up.

Your point about lies needs the irrefutable proof tthat it is happening. Thus Obama's birth fraud.

Why not? This has irrefutable evidence and it is not a rehash but new information. What do you think would be a more effective use of outrage?

I was making a point about the most effective use of outrage during the election, and the most effective use was not to rehash Obama's birth certificate.

There is a civil war going on and the statist govt is in full panic mode. They are trying to install Chinese style media controll. The people in this country better wake up.It is lies and fraud every time you turn around. Please stay safe Donald make it to Inauguration Day and drain the f..ing cesspool. Edit for spelling

I'm not talking about economic theory but about the birth certificate fraud. See at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsydq...

Did you see the video @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsydq...

I didn't find the argument convincing. In particular, I thought the O in Oahu was typed on a different typewriter in the example it was supposed to be copied from. The baseline offset was different.

Applying economic theory, outrage is a limited resource and during the campaign it was more effectively deployed against Hillary.

Why is there no justifiable outrage over the conclusive findings by Arpaio on the phony birth certificate?