Be queerly gay and not multiply..

Or this from Bill Gates he says that in order to successfully depopulate an “overcrowded world” at least 350,000 must be killed each day, and he says this can be done via vaccine programs.

Part of their plan is to undermine reason.

I guess I would just ask them, so what? We as a thinking, reasoning species can adapt, adjust and overcome. Why is NOW the standard. 13000 years ago sea levels were 400 or so feet lower -- is that "ideal?" Should we be trying to trigger a new ice age? Humans don't do real well during colder times (see the mini ice age; the few years following the 1815 volcanic explosion (Tambora) that created social havoc, death and destruction. Would they return the Black Sea to a large fresh water lake. What is the magic of the current shoreline? We need, as a thinking, reasoning group laugh loud and long at these folks lacking science or sense.

And now me the promotion of LGBLT.

Environmentalism is not another name for Marxism. This is supposed to be forum for discussion.

NO. I RESPONDED to YOUR response to MY comment about the SOURCE thread. YOU will not acknowledge that what I said has ANY VALUE. AND, you don't seem to be able to answer a DIRECT question. YOU cannot highjack a comment of MINE, disparage it, and EXPECT ME to GIVE to YOU what YOU will NOT give to me. RESPECT. Good evening.

The viro movement itself has been sickening since its beginning. It is not about stopping pollution harmful to people. Yet the public generally has no idea what they are and goes along with propaganda and emotionalism that is destroying private property rights, industry, and our freedom and right to live.

You have mischaracterized and dismissed the importance of philosophical ideas in determining the course of politics as "nuances of the labels" and a "web of arrogance of intellectualism". You have not discussed the role of ideas or what your own ideas are at all. You don't seem to understand any of this. You have only repeated that you oppose "evil" and "POWER".

The environmentalist movement is a religion and as such, is not open to reason.

You caused to think of a religious group called the Shakers, who decided to practice celibacy.
As a result, they all died out. Guess their Judgement Day came early.

Yeah, giving such econazis a gun may endanger the wrong people
About five minutes after I made that post, I selfishly thought it cheaper and perhaps more pertinent to send Kool-Aid with instructions to mix it with cyanide and sedative the Jim Jones way.

Unless some of this was out of context (which I
doubt), it is sickening.

Agreed!

Send it to this guy for sure .
”Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
David Brower,
First Executive Director of the Sierra Club

Being a good example , will offer the best proof
of the value of ethical self interest.

Let us hope we get an abundance of the latter.

I must agree.

I notice you said "had".

These silly bicamerals don't get the fact that eliminating Humans from the earth would ultimately put the earth in harms way. Without humans, the earth is nothing but resources for other conscious beings and just eliminating a few humans, oh say 6,750,000,000 might make it easier for the parasitical humanoids to rule over what's left...but they too would soon be in trouble too.
On a Fly on the wall session I engage in every week with some brilliant scientist and individuals; we came to the conclusion as to why the earth is not experiencing some of the big changes the other planets in our solar system are is specifically because...on earth...there is life! Not just life; plants, animals etc but "Conscious" life.
Kinda makes one wonder if this thing they have against carbon is a knowing assault upon life itself. It is the life on earth that keeps the earth alive, as they say. The earth, minus life, would just be a dead rock.

Obviously, by arguing the same point ad nauseam and calling my original comment and responses to you a "rant", you don't recognize that there might be any importance of MY ideas. So, you are caught in the web of arrogance of your intellectualism. Very similar to people of the left.

Do you deny that the ultimate goal of all leftists, whatever "concepts" they flog, is power over all?

Recognizing the importance of ideas is not "caught in a web". Ranting about "evil" with no understanding will not stop the political decline of this country.

No Credit needed. I took it from a facebook friend. I have been collecting these and have a few more.

“Ultimately, no problem may be more threatening to the Earth’s environment than the proliferation of the human species.”
— Anastasia Toufexis, “Overpopulation: Too Many Mouths,” article in Time’s special “Planet of the Year” edition, January 2, 1989. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey...





“Today, life on Earth is disappearing faster than the days when dinosaurs breathed their last, but for a very different reason….Us homo sapiens are turning out to be as destructive a force as any asteroid. Earth’s intricate web of ecosystems thrived for millions of years as natural paradises, until we came along, paved paradise, and put up a parking lot. Our assault on nature is killing off the very things we depend on for our own lives….The stark reality is that there are simply too many of us, and we consume way too much, especially here at home….It will take a massive global effort to make things right, but the solutions are not a secret: control population, recycle, reduce consumption, develop green technologies.”
— NBC’s Matt Lauer hosting Countdown to Doomsday, a two-hour June 14, 2006 Sci-Fi Channel special. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey...
“My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem.” http://jiminmontana.wordpress.com/201...



Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, is reported to have said,



“People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them, and this (referring to malaria deaths) is as good a way as any.” http://jiminmontana.wordpress.com/201...



“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,” Turner stated in 1996.[1]



A leading environmentalist, Dr. Eric R. Pianka advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth’s population by airborne Ebola in front of few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science who rose to their feet, and gave him a standing ovation.[2] Dr. Pianka attempted to deny this, but the evidence was overwhelming including his student evaluations.

I actually had friends with PhD's in science argue that even if global warming is wrong the prescriptions are good for us anyway.

Agreed