Safety vs. Freedom (Natural Rights)
Those who would trade a freedom for a little security
will get neither, and
deserve neither
(Benjamin Franklin – sort of)
The purpose of government is to protect your Natural Rights, not to keep you safe. Reversing these is reversing cause and effect. If safety is your priority then the government should build big prisons and put everyone in them where they can protect them.
The safety (security) first goal is why we have no new vaccines, why we banned DDT and killed over 100 million people, why we don’t have nuclear power – resulting in the deaths of 10s of thousands of people. This is precautionary principle of Anthropomorphic Global Warming with the same disastrous results.
will get neither, and
deserve neither
(Benjamin Franklin – sort of)
The purpose of government is to protect your Natural Rights, not to keep you safe. Reversing these is reversing cause and effect. If safety is your priority then the government should build big prisons and put everyone in them where they can protect them.
The safety (security) first goal is why we have no new vaccines, why we banned DDT and killed over 100 million people, why we don’t have nuclear power – resulting in the deaths of 10s of thousands of people. This is precautionary principle of Anthropomorphic Global Warming with the same disastrous results.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
If the focus is on protecting our natural rights then safety and security will naturally follow. They need not be the principle. That said: The Constitution makes clear that "National defense is the priority job of the national government". http://www.heritage.org/research/repo...
Of course, National defense is not the same as providing individual security and one might rightly argue that in many circumstances the government has gone overboard and thus created the problems you cite. Sheople clamor for protection and security provided by our government. Snowflakes need enforced safe zones... when they should grow up, put on their grown up pants and take responsibility for themselves.
Regards,
O.A.
I get natural rights (individuals enter society with certain rights that no government has the right to deny). I also get that we live in a world with boundaries, political and personal. Ignoring those pesky unnatural boundaries is a great way to get yourself hurt or worse.
I have long been in favor of eliminating the FDA, EPA and most of the other illegal government agencies that exist. It is a difficult argument to win. Nancy Pelosi was asked about Trumps pick for SCOTUS. She reflexively went to fear mongering. She said that he would dirty the air and water, take away womens rights, make children less safe...and on and on. Fear and insecurity are effective weapons for Progressives and when you throw in the press as an accomplice it's hard to convince people that freedom and liberty are superior to any alternative.