UCLA bans book defending free speech
UCLA administrator helps "protestors" physically block access to book deemed "inflammatory": Failing to Confront Islamic Totalitarianism: From George W. Bush to Barack Obama and Beyond, which defends free speech against Islamo-fascist bigotry.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog...
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog...
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
"In a letter to ARI, the UCLA School of Law issued a formal apology for the incident, and it explained that the decision to ban the book was inconsistent with its vigorous commitment to freedom of speech and respectful debate. Moreover, the school admitted that it had fallen short of its own commitment to apply policies in a content-neutral manner. The administration detailed steps it is taking to prevent such incidents in the future." https://ari.aynrand.org/blog/2017/02/...
Why should a university "policy" on freedom of books in a "content-neutral manner" be necessary at all and why was it not obvious to officials that their suppression was wrong from the beginning?
"This shameful incident reflects a wider phenomenon on American campuses. At university, students should learn to think, to engage with different views, and thus to grow intellectually. But increasingly, students learn to put their feelings above facts. Some students demand to be protected from what they merely believe, without evidence, are uncongenial views. They demand that non-orthodox views be silenced. And such universities as UCLA willingly coddle and appease them."