Site Enhancement: Recommended Literature
Posted by Wonky 11 years, 7 months ago to The Gulch: Feature Requests
I think a recommended literature enhancement would be very cool. The topic of each post would always be the name of the publication and its and author(s), and the poster would remain anonymous. Anyone could post, and no points would be awarded to the poster. A thumbs up or thumbs down would mean "liked it/relevant", "didn't like it/irrelevant". Again, no points awarded or taken from the poster.
Comments would be divided into 2 groups. One group would be for recommendations by folks who have read it to folks who have not (non-spoilers). The second group would be for those that have read it and would like to discuss it.
Points would be awarded as normal in both groups.
Comments would be divided into 2 groups. One group would be for recommendations by folks who have read it to folks who have not (non-spoilers). The second group would be for those that have read it and would like to discuss it.
Points would be awarded as normal in both groups.
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/g/books
you can download the Kindle app for free here
https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai...
"When Jubal tries to explain religion to him, Smith understands the concept of God only as "one who groks", which includes every extant organism."
I was definely too young to get that. I, to this day, use the word "grok" in everyday language to mean "complete understanding" or well formulated epistemology. In that context, it might actually have some relevance here, but I don't think I'll be making a post on that any time in the foreseeable future.
I'm like number 1 here: http://www.buzzfeed.com/fivezaj/44-reaso...
Load more comments...