Big Surprise: Hitlery voters Give Trump Low Marks for First 100 Days: NBC News/WSJ Poll

Posted by freedomforall 8 years ago to Politics
36 comments | Share | Flag

The title of the article is rubbish so I changed it to the truth. If you look at the demographic chart in the article it shows 93% of Hitlery voters give Trump poor marks. Hitlery got 50% of the votes so 93% x 50% = 46.5%
Big surprise that the poll shows 45% say Trump performance was poor. It appears Trump has won over a few of the irrational idiots who voted for Hitlery and kept all the Trump voters, too.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    He should get on the band wagon and call for a convention of the states...a lot could be done to straighten out the bill of rights. [progressive perversions]
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    I say the same. However, I am reminded by a good friend/coworker that Trump already achieved the primary goal - stopping Hitlery. When I think about what could have happened had she won the election I get chills. I was on the phone with a developer in Panama leading up to the election. I can only tolerate so much and I am sure she would have crossed the line... Now, at least we should have 4 years more time to gather resources, plan, research and enjoy a cold one on American soil.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree on Trump's grade;^) Nothing short of rotolution will fix the swamp. Ryan and the GOP are the problem, and have been since 1964.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 8 years ago
    So far Trump gets an incomplete for his grade thus far. He hasn't done nearly as much as he thought he would. This is no surprise. The system is designed to be an obstruction.

    He may have to call in RotoRooter to drain the swamp. His biggest, but far from only, mistake so far was to let Paul Ryan handle Repeal & Replace. "Repeal" wasn't much of a repeal. Paul Ryan is a big, well-rooted part of the swamp.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Well he hasn't ordered a stay of the federal reserve act, and hasn't started a study to repeal the 16th amendment, and he hasn't ordered a study to repeal the unconstitutional federal gun laws so I'm not satisfied either ;^)
    (I didn't vote for him.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years ago
    I agree the numbers are ambiguous, not surprisingly low marks.

    54% of voters voted for someone else, yet only 45% said he's off to a Poor start. That means many voters who didn't vote for him graded the start Fair or higher.

    OTOH, 46% of voters voted for him, yet Great + Good = 35%. So some people who voted for him are not satisfied.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo