10

Republican Party the most dangerous organization in human history

Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 11 months ago to Philosophy
74 comments | Share | Flag

What does the Elsworth Toohey of today have to say.

The republicans are dangerous because they are filled with RINOS. Not because of the capitalist charade.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by lrshultis 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You might say that Nature or God is the greatest aborter since far more human like embryos and fetuses (nearly all alive), let alone all those spent living sperm who didn't make it, are aborted due to having bad development in the womb.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 7 years, 11 months ago
    No, but Noam Commie is one of the most predictably bad pundits in history.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 7 years, 11 months ago
    I thought the NRA was the most dangerous organization in the world? If only they would make up their minds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by unitedlc 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm not calling it right or wrong, but a fetus is in fact alive... That's like trying to say that a seed that has just begun to sprout roots is not alive. It may not yet be what it will become, but is certainly a living thing...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 7 years, 11 months ago
    That's funny. I think the same thing about this new democrat party, Soros, and their new KKK, antifa. But I'm a term limits guy and believe there are swamps in both parties. People like Pelosi, Waters, Schumer, McCain, Graham, Nelson and so many others that should have been gone after a couple of terms.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Storo 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'd say it's more like two mercinary groups firing on the same group of civilians who have no food shelter or drinking water, and passing laws preventing them from building a house, gardening, or owning buckets.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 7 years, 11 months ago
    While I disagree with his argument I do support his conclusion.

    I have long felt this way. Republican (RINOS) are only slightly less Liberal than the Democrats. Marching onward towards Socialism if anything only marginally slower than the Democrats full fledged stampede towards it.

    While so far there have been FAR less killed in the name of Republicanism than say Mao, Stalin or a whole list of other dictators names. Modern Republicans and Democrats are leading America in the direction that could potentially have similar numbers, and this is why I believe that the Republican party is the most dangerous political party in the world today.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Storo 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Republican RINOs are very dangerous to be sure for reasons stated. But what one has to realize and awaken to is that it is the goal of Democrats to bring about one-party rule, and the goal of Chomsky, Bill Ayres, George Soros, Saul Alynski, Barak Obama and many others not just to bring harm to Trump and the presidency, but to do irrepairable harm to the United States Constitution as a whole and destroy the greatest form of government the world has ever seen - yes, even with its flaws.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ChestyPuller 7 years, 11 months ago
    I am sorry, but when Norm Chomsky says that the Republican's are bad for humanity I can't truly believe it. It is like Hitler claiming Jewish people carry disease same as rats, or Stalin saying the Ukrainians in 1935 died because their crops didn't grow!

    I will agree, though, that when Norm Chomsky calls out something as bad for humanity, humanity should embrace that 'bad' thing tightly and hold on to it as if it were Platinium, Gold or Diamonds
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 7 years, 11 months ago
    Chomskey hasn't been in the news much of late, so he waited until he was in a well covered forum in order to make an outrageous statement. It got him back in. It cleared up his constipation of attention. I'm sure he fells much better now. that he's gotten rid of so much fecal matter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by unitedlc 7 years, 11 months ago
    I'm not religious, just pointing out a fact. If we are defining most dangerous as "number of deaths", then the Pro-Abortion movement would be the most dangerous "organization" in human history. There have been more than 60 million performed since Roe v Wade in the U.S. alone.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 7 years, 11 months ago
    I have to agree with it on at least one point. The republicans are very good at cannibalism and eating their own. In the 2018 elections it could very well be a blood bath for them they will instinctively blame on Trump but they only really have themselves to blame. We handed them full control on a silver platter and they are squandering every bit of it by not supporting their own President.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Joseph23006 7 years, 11 months ago
    I have never found Noam Chomsky very insightful and this latest statement is just way out. If any party is dangerous it is the Democrats because instead of working to find solutions to problems they are sidetracking the process of government with their vendetta against The President and in doing so they may bring about irreparable harm to the office and not just the man!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 7 years, 11 months ago
    what reason is there to separate the repubs from the dems or any other political group? they are all birds of a feather.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    " the economy has gotten worse for many works over the past 30 years and immediately goes to which type of politician can solve that problem"
    Agree that his conclusions are completely wrong, CG. Politicians created the problems that led to poor economic performance (along with the banking cartel created by corrupt politicians.) Literally, the problem will be solved by no politicians.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 11 months ago
    It's hard to listen to 22 min of someone I disagree with so much, but the interviewer did a good job questioning him and letting viewers decide.

    Chomsky is wrong IMHO on two premises.
    1. Politicians have a huge impact on macro trends in labor rates and return on equity..
    2.The trends in recent decades have been unusually bad compared to other mutli-decade periods in history.
    I call them premises because he used them as the basis for his arguments without explaining why.

    I like that he brought up the global warming and nuclear weapons represent a grave threat to humankind that we often ignore. But he talks as if there is a set of policies that solidly addresses them.

    I found his claim about wage insecurity offensive, completely taking Greenspan out of context. He must know it.

    What I came away with is how do we knock out those statist principles. He starts out with this claim the economy has gotten worse for many works over the past 30 years and immediately goes to which type of politician can solve that problem. I wish we could get away from that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mminnick 7 years, 11 months ago
    hyperbole and Hypocrisy. Calling him Ellsworth Toohey is giving Ellsworth a bad rap.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks Freedomforall,
    Mao and Stalin are the prototypes. They will determine what is the greater good. Like Warren and Pelosi or Schummer and Castro or Chavez now Madura.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 11 months ago
    Hypocritical old fart.
    You bought the GOP bullshit about Lincoln because it's convenient to your failed beliefs, Hitlery's bullshit about everything she can't recall because it's convenient to your failed beliefs, and you conclude today's GOP is worse than Mao's 30 million murders and Stalin's 20 million murders. You need remedial math and a big dose of astaxanthin.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 7 years, 11 months ago
    Exactly, he is basically saying they are dangerous because they do not adhere to the same policies of the last 8 years and the redistribution of wealth. Republicans are dangerous, as he says, but only because they are the exact same flavor of corrupt politics that the Democrats are, both parties believing in the power of the elite and party, just a different group of patrons supporting them.Almost like 2 different mercenary groups going at each other.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo