19

Out of Paris Accord

Posted by $ Abaco 7 years, 11 months ago to Government
77 comments | Share | Flag

This is the right move. In my work these kinds of agreements have manifested themselves in all kinds of hairbrained schemes and employed all kinds of "sustainability" snake oil salesmen. It's taken our A&E away from engineering an into the realm of emotion and malarkey.

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Mitch 7 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What problem?
    Who is ignoring said problem?
    Can you quantify the problem (with accurate data)?
    How are people unwilling to pay for the effects of this problem on others?
    How is this disgraceful?

    I’m truly asking these questions as I’m not positive about your post, it’s unclear as to your position.

    Climate change is the only scientific theory in history that has gone from theory to “law” without question and without peer validation. The scientific method encourages debate, climate change is not open for debate. The Paris Accord, from what I have heard (unsubstantiated) is a simple vehicle to redistribute US tax payer’s wealth to the rest of the world.

    Kick it to the curb along with the BS regulations from the EPA.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -7
    Posted by CircuitGuy 7 years, 11 months ago
    Simply ignoring the problem is very close to allowing theft. I am unclear that the Paris Accord is best approach, but simply ignoring the problem is criminal. Their excuse is based on emotion and malarkey, but that's not the cause. The cause is people not wanting to pay for the costs they incur on others and then using any rationalization they can come up with to justify it. It's disgraceful.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo