Trump on infrastructure regulation - a game-changer IF he follows through.

Posted by $ CBJ 7 years, 10 months ago to Politics
54 comments | Share | Flag

“For too long, America has poured trillions and trillions of dollars into rebuilding foreign countries while allowing our own country -- the country that we love -- and its infrastructure to fall into a state of total disrepair. . . I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. . . No longer can we allow these rules and regulations to tie down our economy, chain up our prosperity, and sap our great American spirit. That is why we will lift these restrictions and unleash the full potential of the United States of America. . . We will get rid of the redundancy and duplication that wastes your time and your money. Our goal is to give you one point of contact to deliver one decision -- yes or no -- for the entire federal government, and to deliver that decision quickly, whether it's a road, whether it's a highway, a bridge, a dam."


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately u are right. There really isn't much we can do at this point. We are headed to where Venezuela is at. Ayn Rand predicted this very well
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That is definitely true. Hitler had a large supply of shovel ready jobs too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Accounting-wise, the majority of collections are automatic, and most of the rest is collected in March-April, so there would be a pause before any additional revenue shortfall occurred. But the govt is in over its head already by a half trillion a year. The real result would be from the example being set by Trump in opposition to the state and the banking cartel. The change in the security for any future loans would be devastating to the banksters and as a result, the USD. Trump's life would be in grave peril, imo.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why? He wants massive government spending in the name of "infrastructure" and is trying to make that easier. He's package dealing that with regulation reform.

    It would be good to make approvals easier when the Federal government is in the way of a legitimate project, but Federal approval of that should not be required at all, nor would he be able to ignore the viro laws mandating it. Declaring a super agency "council" for him to make dictatorial decisions evades the whole problem.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    With more assassinations by supporters of socialist Bernie Sanders there are shovel ready jobs here, too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be racist obstruction of justice and collusion. Have you no shame?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Where Putin can also terminate his political opponents or common joe with impunity? I'll take the bureaucracy over a tyrant, acknowledging that it's a fine line.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The first stimulus bill was sold as spending on “shovel ready” projects to provide the jobs that would put millions of people back to work.

    According to Recovery.gov, the President’s own website which accounts for the stimulus funding (ahem), of the first $787 billion stimulus bill, a full $275 billion has gone un-spent as of August 27, 2010. And of the $512 billion of stimulus already spent, only $18.5 billion (less than seven percent) has been paid out by the Department of Transportation on these “shovel ready” jobs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Shovel ready programs are rare with all the red tape.
    Obama knew of this scarcity and never intended to help the infrastructure.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A mixed message that might be misinterpreted. Part of Trump's appeal was the expectation that business conditions would improve. If people quit buying stuff, business conditions will worsen and Trump will be blamed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In that regard, Putin has an advantage - he can terminate his bureaucracy. Literally. In the US the bureaucrats are protected from most Executive action by legislation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am from Missouri...I'll believe it when I see it..."Show me"...however...if the fed never took the money out of our the states in the first place, each state could do for themselves and I wouldn't have to pay for the infrastructure of others.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The swamp is deep and wide, and will resist. Even Putin said that the bureaucracy in the USA really runs the show here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The swamp needs the IRS collections to keep alive. It would help much more if people just cut their buying for a couple of months of things that they didnt really need- THAT would send a big message.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 7 years, 10 months ago
    I voted for Trump so as to at least slow down the march to socialism and do a little swamp draining. I am behind him 100% on those goals. The establishment correctly has identified what Trump is up to, and is dead set against him.

    I saw Oliver Stone's Putin interviews, and frankly was impressed by Putin (not so much with Stone, but at least he kept his leftist ideas to himself in this piece). All this anti russian stuff the left is promoting is just keeping Trump and Putin from really starting to cooperate instead of fighting. Trump would be attacked unmercifully for even talking to Putin at this point, which is a REAL SHAME. The Hillary and Bernie supporters are just willing to sacrifice the USA and keep on trying to stop trump. We need to have better foreign relations with Russia and China, and stop useless fighting in the middle east where we gain nothing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I should have concluded my thought. . . .to enrich themselves by the destruction of others.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 7 years, 10 months ago
    When Obama tried to do infrastructure, and discovered how long it took just to wade through the environmental studies, he just gave up and spent the money elsewhere. I'm glad to see Trump is tackling the issue of excessive regulation head-on, which is more presidential.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 7 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Everyone's motive, but in Trump's case "enrichment" may be getting patted on the head by some people, which may put his motive's in line with ours, the only way we succeed.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 7 years, 10 months ago
    The promise of making the government more efficient usually results in it being more destructive efficiently. I don't trust Trump any more than any other politician that might be enlisted. Their motive is not to 'help' the people. It is to enrich themselves.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo