How The Trans Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everybody
"It’s ironic that those leading the charge for the transgender revolution would claim there is only *one* right side to history."
"Indeed, “civil rights” is always a nice line. It works well to stop debate. There’s lots of emotional blackmail involved because of the social punishments (labels of “hater” or “bigot”) heaped upon anyone who might question the agenda."
"Indeed, “civil rights” is always a nice line. It works well to stop debate. There’s lots of emotional blackmail involved because of the social punishments (labels of “hater” or “bigot”) heaped upon anyone who might question the agenda."
Previous comments... You are currently on page 7.
Ah, but right there you have fallen into their clever trap. Two people of the same gender hooking up does not equate to a marriage. You are buying into the notion that there is no such thing as gender at all and that society has no need for mothers and fathers - nor do children. That was the whole point of the article.
Sociologically and morally, how do you teach children how to be good parents and how to relate to others without role models of both sexes? Answer: you can't. It is impossible. All one has to do is look at the breakdown in the African-American community since the 1950's due to the explosion in unwed motherhood to see what happens when you eliminate the traditional core of father (male) and mother (female) from marriage. You get significantly higher crime rates, gang formation, lack of education, MORE unwed pregnancies, higher drug addiction rates, etc. You get a societal cancer.
I've already seen what happens when parents break up at a very personal level. I find it hard to believe that anyone would wish that upon an entire civilization - let alone a single family.
What makes me uncomfortable is how groups seeking approval for incest and pedophelia are trying to tie their tail to the kite of homosexual rights. Membership in the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) should be a criminal offense, in my opinion.
If I walked up to you with a 6 month old dog, and said "hey, how do you like my new leopard?" Would you be wrong to say "Dude, that's a dog, not a leopard"? Would you be doing me a favor by saying "wow dude, cool leopard you got there"?
No, you would be feeding my own mental disease if I truly believed I was walking around a Leopard (or my just plain weirdness for the sake of attention).
In the same way, if dude is born with XY chromosomes, I'm calling HIM a guy, even if he "identifies" as a woman. I don't freaking care what you "identify" with, you're a man. And you're going to freaking use the men's restroom because if I ever catch you going into or coming out of the woman's restroom where my wife and daughters go, I will have it in mind to pound you into the dirt you freaking pervert.
Same goes for a woman. If you're born with XX, you're a chick. Not a dude. You want to change your name to Butch, that's fine, depending how long I've known you, I may call you Mary, or I may call you Butch, but I'm not going to call you "Butch the man".
That 0.000000001% of the time is when someone's born with two distinct sets of chromosomes. It's so utterly rare in transgenders that it's basically statistically insignificant to the discussion.
So, the source of the dog's testosterone is removed.
but dang it-I do not like to be railroaded!
I've also wondered why, if this is such an effective birth control method, more parents aren't encouraged to use it on their teenage children...
Not as tortured as the logic that people with deviant sexual appetites are somehow being denied "marriage rights" simply because they can't marry a member of the same sex, or a dog, or a cucumber. People with deviant sexual appetites already have equal marriage rights.
"I'm very happy to see traditional gender roles broken down"
You're very sick, then.
"The authors grandkids will be embarrassed to be associated with this bigotry."
This is what the progressives call "progress". Over the past half-century and more, they have pushed the envelop bit by bit, destroying cultural norms based upon human nature, claiming moral righteousness in fighting for "fairness" where there is no unfairness "equality" where equality is an impossible measure. And painting anyone who refuses to conform to the new norm as stupid, primitive, backwards, bigoted, hateful.
First they hid in the civil rights movement, then in the feminist movement, now in the LBGT movement. And any time someone predicted that we'd be right here someday, they were pooh-poohed in the media and by all "right-thinking" people as being alarmist.
I remember Geraldine Ferraro, back in 84, laughing at the idea that we'd ever have unisex bathrooms or put women in combat. Lessee...30 years later, we've had both for awhile now.
What you mean when you say, "the author's grandkids will be embarrassed" is "in another 20 years, we'll have managed to brainwash the young enough to think such deviancy is normal, and they'll have nothing to compare it to."
That's why the overwhelming population of the gulch is old, and why the focus in elections is the young people, because the old folks still remember way back in their hindbrains what the world was like before we started listening to the terminally insane.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuticles
http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2...
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/up...
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-DDCe7b-0reg/UM...
This is tortured logical gymnastics trying to find a way denying people equal marriage rights paradoxically gives people more rights.
I would say this employment act isn't really doing transgendered people any favors. When people talk to transgender people, they will legitimately wonder if they're there on their merits or if someone was afraid of being accused of discrimination. I'm very happy to see traditional gender roles broken down. The authors grandkids will be embarrassed to be associated with this bigotry. If she wants to make things hard for minorities, though, she should support the gov't helping them with non-discrimination laws.
And no I am not making that up
Let's all just melt into one big blob of nothing for the purpose of the greater good and fairness for ALL.
Load more comments...