10

How The Trans Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everybody

Posted by khalling 10 years, 9 months ago to Culture
180 comments | Share | Flag

"It’s ironic that those leading the charge for the transgender revolution would claim there is only *one* right side to history."

"Indeed, “civil rights” is always a nice line. It works well to stop debate. There’s lots of emotional blackmail involved because of the social punishments (labels of “hater” or “bigot”) heaped upon anyone who might question the agenda."


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 6.
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 9 months ago
    Re-definition of basic descriptive words and phrases by progressives makes discussion and even thought more and more difficult for many people. It's been going on for a number of years and is a major tool of socialist. Can anyone remember the fight over Ebonics being taught in school from Oakland back in the 70's and 80's?

    Changing language to control thought.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -2
    Posted by barwick11 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Trans in my mind may as well be synonymous with pedophilia. At the very least a mental disorder. Someone who is clearly a man but "identifies" as a woman and wants to be treated as a woman... Something's not right in their head.

    Now, that's not to say they have to *act* like a man, but to expect people to CALL you a woman? No... that's just lunacy.

    Now would I honestly pound someone into the dirt? No, but I certainly would not be ok with some random dude walking into the women's bathroom because he thinks he's a chick.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I 'm sure it 's a huge challenge. Also lots of love. Neither of which the govt should be a stakeholder in.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -4
    Posted by johnmahler 10 years, 9 months ago
    This is a mental sickness. It should not be funded by any draw of largesse. These people are free to be whatever gender they "trick" themselves to believing they are. The only time it comes to political awareness is when the mental illness garners wealth from the republic by demanding it be funded as a class of citizen not equal to every other citizen. If this invented factionalization is permitted to stand in our nation, it will soon resemble a fractured automotive windshield. Shall we call ourselves the FSA Factional States of America? This is what the left has been trying to do from the Civil Rights 1960's to the present. Too bad all gays are not people of color. Maybe "white guilt" would have worked better.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 10 years, 9 months ago
    Can I redefine my Special Needs (thanks to Vietnam and Agent Orange) daughter as a child even thought she's 32, still living with us, so I don't have to buy a bond to protect her money from me even though I support her furnished housing, food, clothing, etc., and have to report her income, expenses, etc. to the courts every three years with a lawyer that costs another $600? I only have to do this because she is an adult and I need guardianship in order to make medical decisions for her. This kind of irks me. Perhaps I can redefine her as my permanent 16 year old son and forgo all the court required nonsense and expense every three years. (It's just another form of wealth redistribution)..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 9 months ago
    Some of us will have a difficult time adapting to the required political correctness no matter how tolerant we are. https://screen.yahoo.com/pat-birthday-pa...
    Minorities of every persuasion often seem to want more than equality. They want special consideration... government intervention. I would not ask for government intervention to stop them. It is none of my business.
    Personally I have no problem with people being who they are as long as they do not shove it in my face. If I see a hetero couple engaging in public acts that are none of my business, I mind my own business, but I want to say "get a room." If I see lewd behavior the source is irrelevant. If you want to be an exhibitionist Mardi Gras is the place you ought to be. :) Strangers ought to have warning and a choice. Parents should not have to explain to their children things they are not yet old enough for. I sound like an old fuddy-duddy. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Years ago I was at a Renaissance Fair (as an actor)... we were standing outside the portapotties waiting for one of the handicapped units to open up (if you've ever worn a huge hoop skirt, you'll understand)...

    This woman (customer) walks out, comments how *nice* these portapotties were, why, they even put this nice purse tray next to the seat...

    We all looked at her purse, and of course, it was soaked on the bottom... and it took all we had not to burst out laughing.

    At least she didn't ask why the "soap" in the "sink" smelled funny, and didn't lather up...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I read that (Aus ruling)and had an immediate eeewww that's not natural feeling. LGBT stuff doesn't bother me the same way. Who am I to say what two consenting adults can agree to as long as they aren't harming one another. No-I do draw the line there. I think it's criminal when couples cut one another or other sick crap like that. as I said on a social media site-was I the only one who thought the Luke Leia thing was a close call?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 10 years, 9 months ago
    In the article I read about the children becoming owned by the State. My Special Needs (thank you Vietnam and AO {not ) daughter still lives with us. We needed and obtained court ordered guardianship for one reason, so we could remain able to make medical decisions for her (an adult). Being that we a her guardians we need to file with the court every three years a breakdown and copies of al lher financial transactions, wages, Social Security, etc. to prove we are not stealing her money. It doe snot matter that she doesn't get enough to sustain her own life and that we contribute housing, food, clothing, etc. to our little girl. I few could re-designate her as our daughter again, as a child, perhaps we could forgo the court ordering reporting every three years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You can find the web site for NAMBLA here: http://www.nambla.org . If leaving a record of visiting such a site makes you squeamish, wikipedia has an entry here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMBLA

    The goal of NAMBLA is broader than just for males having sex with minor males. They want to eliminate ALL age of consent laws, which, I suspect is to gain support from other pedophiles of the lesbian and heterosexual stripe.

    I haven't seen an organized group promoting incest (but then I haven't spent much time looking), but an Australian judge recently made headlines by saying that with the existence of many methods of contraception, incest shouldn't be a crime (since the common argument against family sex was to prevent genetic birth disorders). I suppose one could argue that incest between adults shouldn't be a big deal, but I'll leave that up to individual opinion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 10 years, 9 months ago
    Sorry kh, I do not know if I should give you a point or not. I only read a couple of sentences of that and had a convulsion of ROFL.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    what?! I have never heard of such a thing...That would be a good post...where is the line drawn between speech and crime ...games and vilence
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "And you're going to freaking use the men's restroom because if I ever catch you going into or coming out of the woman's restroom where my wife and daughters go, I will have it in mind to pound you into the dirt you freaking pervert."
    barwick, I think this statement is rather ignorant. Trans is not synonymous with pedophilia. So your exclamation of use of force is outrageous. You are entitled to your opinion, but a trans female would only be comfortable going to a female restroom. I know I'm uncomfortable going into a men's room. I'd probably be fine with uni-sex bathrooms, if it wasn't for those nasty urinals...what's up with that? why don't men want to pee in private? ;)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have no idea why I'm even posting this, but...

    I'm no expert on genetics, either normal or with trans-people, but your figures come out to 7/100 of one person. For the entire planet.

    I hate people who do that - pull a number out of thin air to make a point how "bad" or "right" they are, or to make some over-emphasized point.

    Now... where's the popcorn?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 9 months ago
    Agree with Khalling.

    However part of the problem is the legal recognition of marriage and gender. If we didn't have obamacare and unnecessary special tax treatment for married couples, a lot of the distinction these weirdos want to draw out and blatantly buck would be uninteresting personal choices that affect no one else.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Susanne 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks!!! One reminds me of a coworker at my 5 to 9.. strangely, he's our comm tech, so the stuff in the background fits.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo