Jan Schakowsky tries minimum wage - Sarah Smith - POLITICO.com

Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 9 months ago to Business
38 comments | Share | Flag

I just saw this bonehead on Neil Cavuto talking about "Living the wage".... I'm speechless! She's so out of touch she actually thinks people shouldn't have to worry about what they pay when they grocery shopping and how maybe having to put something back on the shelf because you don't have enough money for it is just so hard to do and no one should have to live like that. OMG! This way of thinking is very scary to me.


All Comments

  • Posted by Notperfect 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are right LS. I hope the hell she has enough salt. OOPS I forgot I do reside in Mi. Plenty of brine to go around.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wouldn't surprise me if she claims she had to eat your boots from having to live on starvation wages and all.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Notperfect 10 years, 9 months ago
    When Shakowsky lives on $7.25 per/hr I will eat my boots. There is no proof and this is nothing more than Natzi propaganda from the horses mouth. Her shame has no bounds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's the way I was raised too.

    Now I feel like a relic.
    And a fool.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And there is 24 hours in every day so there is nothing stopping a person from working more than 40 hours. Well nothing except the space between both ears and government policy that slows growth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    the way I was raised, special treatment came from
    working well, hard, and persistently -- and from
    personal integrity, honesty and such ... how sadly
    times have changed. upside down and backwards.
    no wonder my moral compass is "radical", now. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Living the wage. What a crock. I'm sick of these assholes feeding into the entitled mind set. Their agenda is obvious. Buying votes to keep power. And the stupid sheep think the rich thieving politicians gives a shit. Pathetic.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm starting to think people WANT to be under dogs and cry baby losers... their taught that this how you get special treatment... And they all want to be more special and more needy than the next person like it's a competition to be won. Who's the sorriest looser? "They Don't need it I need it!" "I need it more than you". "No I do." Meanwhile the go getters just want to be left alone to succeed and that's the behavior that gets ridiculed. Everything is backwards.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    well, she gets (rather than makes) about $87.50 per
    hour, so losing the option to buy something spontaneously
    is a real hardship. poor dear, such suffering. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    you just look at U.S. history and see how this nation
    got to be the strongest on the planet. they are sooooo
    blind to this!!! -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and when the inevitable inflation sneaks in, from all
    of this "quantitative easing", bread will be $15 a loaf
    and we'll all be in a 39% tax bracket. it's like BHO's
    comment that "electricity prices will necessarily
    skyrocket" -- it's intentional. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah not many have the independent brain power to question how many more jobs there would if gov stayed the hell out of the way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 10 years, 9 months ago
    How does one quantify jobs that might have been. They can't. That is why such a simplistic understanding and approach to economics can allow people like this to propagate their nonsense.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bassboat 10 years, 9 months ago
    She is probably the same person who does not know who we fought in the Revolutionary War. We graduate diplomas, not graduates of higher learning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 9 months ago
    I used to watch fox business on Saturday mornings but have given up since they insist upon having economic nitwits as is evidenced by this story.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 9 months ago
    Again, since working at Wal-mart, I've seen people have to reject buying stuff at the registers because they discover they don't have enough money for it.

    I feel bad, but remind myself that shame is a character-building mechanism.

    You can tell the ones who are spending their own money from the one's spending taxpayers' money, btw. The former look around furtively, embarrassed. The latter glare angrily.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BradA 10 years, 9 months ago
    I could not resist adding my own comment on the Politicrap site:

    Jan seems to have a problem with her math. Which explains much about Congress. At $7.25 / hour and a 40 hour work week, in Illinois (her home state) you would net $225 / week, not $77.
    But assuming we're talking a food budget of $77/week, even out here in over priced California, I would have no problem feeding myself on that kind of budget.
    This Congress critter is clearly out of touch with reality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 9 months ago
    She's an idiot who has never had to scrabble to survive. Having to budget, looking for bargains, buying a similar but cheaper product -- all the day-to-day tasks of the average American on a salary of any kind, except, obviously, in her income range. When my BW and me were first married, we counted every penny. We shared a five year old car. (My current on is 9 years old). Today, many years later, we don't need to do that, but we still do. It became ingrained in us by overcoming hardship.
    A famous Latin phrase translates as "Through hardship, to the stars." Not "Through undeserved benefits to the stars."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Your right and they all translate to more money for government and less for the producers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Excellent point. One also has to remember that many other things are pegged to the automatic cost-of-living increases, such as government pay and other government welfare programs.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The only way for people to keep the Press honest is to study the issues themselves rather than rely solely on the Press for their information. Sadly, that really started going downhill in the 60's when people got used to broadcast news that was all run by leftists.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by H2ungar123 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Absolutely right re: Cavuto not nailing her - I'm
    a Cavuto fan but so disappointed in his passing
    on this...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We also need to consider who the real benefactor is in all these higher wages and that is the government. The more people make, the higher there tax bracket. Inflate to make things more costly, do not adjust the amount you make before hitting a higher tax bracket and more money flows to government.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo