I don't believe these groups care about anyone's civil rights but their own. What they really care about is power. Feminists have no interest in helping women and children living under sharia. BLM are racist and advocate violence. Antifa are themselves fascists. These groups can't garner widespread support because few people respect their actions. So, they embrace each other and repeat their lies in the hope that it will undermine the current structure.

Your Civil Rights...
You have the right to be warm when the sun shines and to drink when it rains. Everything else, you have to work for.

They are fighting against rights, not in favor of them.

http://www.thesavvystreet.com/beware-...

They are not fighting for civil rights. They are trying to destabilize the current administration and they come up with these "rights" meme's so they can recruit useful idiots to swell their ranks.

I don't think any of these movements ever had as their goal to make things fair (equal not being the same thing as fair). Their demand to be equal is to demand that the any particular group be represented by the same percentage in any business or profession and if they are not then someone needs to be fined or imprisoned is the same as the slavery or Jim Crow laws they protest. These movements are about convincing the government and the populace to behave in the same manner as what they supposedly hate. To ensure they can use the violence authorized by the state to plunder others and give to them in quest to make things 'equal'. I once worked for a grocery store chain that was fined $5000 every year for not having someone of African descent working there. I lived in a very small town and there were no African Americans who lived there so the people paid more for their necessities because of something that could not be helped. I was also told if an African American ever applied someone was going to be gone so they could save the money, not because the individual being hired might be better suited to the job.
As far as who should vote I say almost no one should have that right. It was once noted by a Roman Emperor that the more people he could give the vote to the more likely he could be emperor for life and do whatever he liked to the Romans, civil rights would be damned by the populace who would give up their rights to be entertained by the state, have their food and property stolen by the state and when some of it was returned to them they would celebrate and praise those who ruled them. I understand the original constitutional law that only those who had property could vote, in other words those who had something to lose if the wrong character become a lawmaker. However watching those who are worth billions get on board with the socialists I don't know that was a good qualifier either. The only vote that really counts is my ability to say no. When Obamacare is voted into being and I am approached if I can say no and have that respected then I don't care what is authorized by 'law'. If I can't say no then I am a dead man because the majority will always vote to steal my property, my authority over my own life and anything else they can get their hands on without killing me for a dead slave is not a productive slave and has nothing to steal.

These groups rub me the wrong way, because they treat people as "we" rather than "I", and make them herd animals. Secondly, they sell them on the fact they are all victims. They diminish the value of the individual and their personal abilities to make responsible decisions and act on them, Instead, the brain-dead members of these groups go around spouting talking points and seeking revenge for wrongs that either were long ago solved, or cannot be solved on a group basis. Long ago when college tried to sell me on feminist courses, I said no thanks, no way was i falling into that trap. I was already an individual, well aware of what I had to do as such to prove my ability, and it worked. I always felt it was up to me to do my job so as to gain the respect that work deserved, and I did not need a bunch of "sisters" telling me to be angry. The same goes for blacks, who long ago earned respect as talented real musicians, not rappers. Firtzergerald, Horne, Callaway, Armstrong, Eubie Blake, rose through personal talent, not group think or protests.

You can include in this unions. They all started out with a legitimate concern about something basic: human rights, dignity, work conditions, etc. All sought to continue to exist after their initial goals had been achieved by inventing a continuation of the abuses. All operate based on invented abuses and inequalities, seeking not for equality, but superiority. They should all be shunned by sane people because they have no logical basis and have turned to emotional manipulation and mob rule.

Feminism is an idea (not a group) that I strongly support. BLM is a group I support. I strongly support their goal of reducing racism.

This doesn't matter, though, unless you're just taking a survey. Do you have some thoughts about how they interact or relate to Ayn Rand's books?