It's also a slippery slope. Once gov't can decide to use force to make her give birth, can they make her follow all doctor's recommendations such as bedrest, new medications, etc. Can they force her to eat a healthy diet?
If we let the gov't take control over people when they get pregnant, in order to protect the fetus, just how far does that control go?
We need to invent technology to extract the fetus so the gov't can protect it without taking over another citizen's life.
I don't know the exact number but are not 10 million murders since Roe v. Wade cause enough to rethink this? That is, of course, you think a human fetus is a living soul and worthy of birth and an opportunity at life. Having listened to your sycophantic ranting in other threads, probably not. But then your mother made another decision and you're 'living' proof instead of a cremated pile of ash blowing in the wind somewhere.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
:)
If we let the gov't take control over people when they get pregnant, in order to protect the fetus, just how far does that control go?
We need to invent technology to extract the fetus so the gov't can protect it without taking over another citizen's life.