The "irrationalism, paranoia, and emotional outbursts" on this topic are decades old. "Moderation and caution" on behalf of the paranoid are not rational. New Agers don't know the difference.

I don't see the, " irrationalism, paranoia, and emotional outbursts" you do. I have seen a few that are truly trying to see if the statistical data matches the physical data. From what I can see lately, is a call for moderation and caution.

We have changed our living environment through the use of these technologies in addition to what the natural world throws at us.
One should expect other changes to occur as a result.

As the irrationalism, paranoia, and emotional outbursts spread it becomes increasingly difficult for rational people in an industry based on a once advanced civilization to contend with it.

The industry deals with hysteria existing regardless of the science.

To the one that marked this down...That was humor,..silly.

Those devices never work...nothing but thunderstorms creates that frequency...something all life on earth is used to, like gravity and piezoelectricity things the body dearly miss in space.

I think the idea, (still a bit skeptical but interested) is that in small doses radio waves and microwaves pose not much harm to the body but our world is inundated with these frequencies, I know myself that I have to change up how I deal with my environment at work which is like working inside a microwave oven. The portable phone I have to have with me all the time must be carried in different places periodically otherwise I experience pain in that region.
From what I understand, if you have a well functioning immune system, what ever damage is caused can be repaired by the body. Most people these days do not have much of an immune system left to do any meaningful repairs to their bodies.

Like most things...moderation is key and that is what the industries are finally suggesting.

Cell phones: are they emitting ionizing radiation in the frequency range of positive or negative effects on me?

Odd, isn't it, that medical books don't mention Schumann resonances (SR)? That's because of pseudoscience that has no empirically objective effects beyond what charlatans and con-artists are using to screw people out of their money like they did with the scalar wave device hoaxes. Schumann resonances (SR) https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4352

"Many marketers of jewelry that claims to provide health or sports performance benefits cite the Schumann resonance as the science behind their claim. A notable example is the Power Balance bracelets. Tom O'Dowd, formerly the Australian distributor, said that the mylar hologram resonated at 7.83 Hz. When the bracelet was placed within the body's natural energy field, the resonance would "reset" your energy field to that frequency. Well, there were a lot of problems with that claim. First of all, 7.83 Hz has a wavelength of about 38,000 kilometers. This is about the circumference of the Earth, which is why its atmospheric cavity resonates at that frequency. 38,000 kilometers is just a little bit bigger than a 1 or 2cm hologram; there's no way that something that tiny could resonate such an enormous wavelength. O'Dowd's sales pitch was implausible, by a factor of billions, to anyone who understood resonance."

There are frequencies that have little to no effect on living things, frequencies that do have a negative effect and others that have a positive effect.
An example of one that has a positive effect is 7.8hz...the shuman resonance.
So, a little informal experimentation on my part, at least on an intermittent basis, produced a beneficial effect.
I can only recount what I have observed and experienced.
Although it's not part of my work, I hope that someday I will be able to get the tech. to measure and test these results.

"...more beneficial frequency..." There's a woo term.

Not only has it been neither proved nor proved impossible under any possible circumstances, countless investigations have shown that there is nothing to the hysterical claims and pseudo-evidence. It is beyond the realm of being taken seriously at all. The ongoing insistent claims demanding to be taken seriously have no cognitive status whatsoever, including the the demands to keep "considering" it.

And That inlays the problem and why it is so hard to vet out. For every rational voice, careful investigation there are 10 charlatans, not to mention, 20 crony protectionist.

But recent articles presented by nasa, reported on by Ben at suspicious observers shows that these fields in nature and strong solar storms are harmful to the weak, the sick and vulnerable with out sufficient immune systems, (to rebuild damaged cells)...I would also include, the unaware in terms of behavior and we do see a Lot of bad behavior these days...they can't all be paid by sorass.

Much of the "fear" about this is the fact that most people don't understand it. It reminds me of why people were burned at the stake for demonstrating something that people couldn't comprehend.

I have worked in the field of RF for 40 years and have seen absolutely nothing that would lead me to be concerned.

It's no different than "Global Warming". I can't prove that is isn't human caused and you can't prove that it is. However, liberals can scream (and cry) a lot louder than I can, so you seldom here the voice of reason amidst the din.

"Natural" effects are not the hysteria that is being promoted and this "documentary" is not for "objective consideration".

Intense microwaves and large doses of nuclear radiation are not evidence of what you claim. There has been "objective consideration" for decades. The "world" certainly does "change" as it becomes increasingly irrational and gullible.

Even NASA scientist have observed that natural EM fields effect the brain and the body of humans in studies of solar storm conditions...so what's so different with wifi, microwaves or even over exposures of radio waves.

It's worth consideration, is all I suggest.

The world is changing it's mind on this one, more and more research by private, non connected, non political individuals and groups have been conducted...the post only advises only some objective consideration.

Micro waves are harmful beyond natural sources, with depressed immune systems...it is most certainly, harmful.

Nor should it be regarded as "possible", let alone the dire fear-mongering being promoted. These claims about EM fields have been investigated for decades with no evidence or explanation to back up the continued hysteria.

Your "not knowing enough about it yet" is what they are counting on. Paranoia over electromagnetic fields ranging from electric power to telephones has been spread for decades with no proof. The hype in this "documentary" is only more instance and should not be promoted on an Ayn Rand forum.

To my understanding, they have observed the effects upon cells in these energy fields.
My advice at this time would be to engage in "Moderation".
I know that my body is sensitive, even though I have an extraordinary immune system. I have experimented with adding different materials in order to create a more beneficial frequency overall...seems to work but still have to change up things due to a body, (brain and mind) that gets bored easily.

I don't know enough about it yet. There was hysteria about Alar, as I recall, and other such things. Personally, I don't have a working cell phone now. Mine conked out a few months ago, and since then, I have been unable to find one to buy that is not made in China. I have been trying to find a second-hand landline phone. (Second-hand, because then it would be older and less likely to be a piece of Communist crap).

It is interesting to note how statistical analysis can be applied and miss applied. For example, it can be shown that there is a very strong relationship between mathematical ability and shoe size. The relationship is real and is easily demonstrated however, it can lead to unwarranted conclusions. A statistical analysis of the relationship between mathematical ability and shoe size encompasses the entire population including infants. How useful is that information? When it comes to the biological impact of microwave radiation on living issue and DNA coding there is no known mechanism that would suggest a connection. That does not mean that such a mechanism does not exist only that it has not been identified. While statistics may suggest a path of inquiry it should not be interpreted as identification of a causal relationship.

There are scientific articles all over the interweb. I'll look tonight if I have time.
There has been years of work done on this topic.

I tried to fact check this article but could not find a site that had any information on this. :-(

I predicted reduced life expectancy in my first book 6 years ago and that is exactly what I have been seeing, mostly cancer in the young. At Connecticut Hospice we see more young people...15-50 than we see 80-100.

The really old are outliving the really young 2 to 1.

I do not believe the youth of America will live long enough to experience what ever it is one gets from excessive exposure to radiation.
the youth of America is already experiencing a significant increase in diabetes, social diseases, obesity, an increase in auto accidents due to text messaging and who know what else they use their phones for while driving, increase in drug use made available to them by the government, need I go on. and I do believe the projected life expectancy is also falling. The rest of the world may catch up to us someday but I do not believe that someday is any time soon in this century. in the famous words of Alfred E Newman "what me worry"!