

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
In the case of public schools that require young people to subject themselves to 12 years if being “taught” isn’t effective because they aren’t motivated to “learn”.
I would say public school for me was pretty much a waste of time. I learned far more outside of enforced schools than I did in those 12 years of government indoctrination
In the cause of wealth transfer to other peoples children, it also results in too many children because the true cost of raising them is artificially hidden to the parents of those children. Same is true of welfare given to parents who can’t afford to bring children into the world, and leads to unsustainable population growth
I can see both sides of taxes to provide education. Most people agree with taxes for police and jails, and if education can provide some of that same benefit it makes sense to fund it the same way. OTOH that's a slippery slope that can lead to gov't taking responsibility for all needs of families with children which can further slide into gov't being involved even in middle-class expenses, e.g. public school and PPACA. As you say, it leads to way too many laws, which leads to disrespect for the law. So I'm conflicted in that I want gov't to help the poor in a limited way but fear it always grows out of hand.
Way too many laws. Taxation is the biggest one. I don’t have kids but I have to pay property taxes which are used primarily to educate other people’s kids
I said something like that to ewv. He says the Constitution does prevent takings, but we don't follow it. He says no piece of paper on earth can reach out and make people follow it if they don't agree with its philosophy. He may be right, but I agree we should try to have a system of checks and balances that tries to make people do the right thing.
If Napolitano is classic "Liberal", and I think that is true, then he is a supporter of the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution in its original meaning which allows only very limited government.
As for Fox, they are the real supporters of unlimited GOP power, not limited government. So you're right, Napolitano doesn't really belong on Fox but at least sometimes Fox pretends to care about limited government.
Napolitano cites the decisions that Kav has made that support big gov power oevr individual rights, so it's not just what Napolitano says, it's Kavanaugh's actions that matter.
It's awful that we rarely talk about policy differences and instead just talk about jailing political enemies. I don't get I this because it's nothing to me if a particular politician is jailed for some technicality. I want the system to enforce the laws, but I get nothing out of any individual being convicted. I want people left alone to pursue happiness.
As to whether she can be jailed, I really don’t know if she broke laws that can be proven and that aren’t past the statute of limitations. At this point I am not sure it’s worth it to pursue. She will never hold high office again
I remember the whole Monica Lewinsky thing. The only thing I thought about it was that bill clinton actually thought she would keep a secret. Any CEO would know some lowly intern is going to brag to her friends almost immediately- which is what she did
McCain and Romney made too many of them just want to sit at home on election days.
The Tangerine Tornado knew how to push the right hot buttons.
I think he still does.
And I really hope I'm right for the sake of this country.
Oh, it will get way uglier but I think the Tangerine Tornado will prevail.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/...
Since the media felt compelled to dig up dirt on Joe The Plumber as a distraction after Obooboo told him, "I want to spread the wealth around," evidently it was thought a slogan like "MARCHING ON TO SOCIALISM" just wouldn't work out well.
Bolshevik Bernie and Wannabe Commie Ocasio-Cortez would have no problem with that, though.
Load more comments...