She is a democratically motivated tool. She cant seem to remember details until she figures out kavanaugh's defense, and she can fit her story into it. Why else not "remember" time, place, who was there, how she got there. The doesnt want to say anything that could be refuted. Keep it vague

I think you will be surprised by the FBI finding "something" either accidentally or on purpose that requires further investigation. Plus the fact that the two worthless women republican senators still have to be convinced, even if flake stops flaking.

I think its serious business for the liberals. They want to use the courts to get their agenda furthered. They figure its cool to have the two houses of congress plus the president on their side to pass laws, BUT thats somewhat hard to do. So lets cover all the bases by getting the SC to side with them.

Its a war out there, and we need to take sides. The liberals are evil and should be treated that way. Give in on NOTHING to them.

What about allegations of gay sex. That would get a rise out of people. You can bet that by Friday there will be additional allegations that "need" to be investigated for weeks.

This whole debacle reminds me of Chamberlain and Hitler, where concessions are made that just gave Hitler more time to do what he intended to do anyway.

You refer to women in power who view the end as justifying the means. I would add Jezebel and Hillary to your mix.

Very few women are true benevolent leaders. The Gulch has quite a few.

Yes.

I wonder if the FBI will question Ford. We don't know anything about her except that she came forward with a "case" but her account is full of holes.

Mitchell, the prosecutor hired by the GOP stated that "No reasonable prosecutor would have brought a case" - paraphrasing Comey, of all fame.

Watching Ford testify, she did not strike me as someone "traumatized". She was matter of fact, carefully coached to sound "innocent girlish".

It would be of interest why her yearbook was scrapped from the net? Which according to people in the know paints a completely different picture of her than what Feinstein came forward with.

You assume she's telling the truth -she's not. The whole thing WAS SCRIPTED and borders on perjury. This is the exact story we expected and the gullible masses are eating it up.At best ,she was a drunken tramp who can't remember who she said yes or no to. At worst, she's taking one for the team, with a straight up lie, and relying on traditional Republican weakness to stay out of jail. This is part payback for "moderate " Garland and part the opening salvos of a battle for control of the Court, which the leftists desperately need to overcome the Constitutional constraints their dogma must overcome. This is only beginning, and it's going to get REALLY ugly.

I know,

I know your are upset who isn't , but the top contenders for the Democratic Socialist party president candidate 2020.
Sanders , Warren , Biden , Harris , Booker, Gillibrand , Oprah , Michele Robinson, Stephen Colbert. NOT ONE OF THEM CAN HOLD A CANDLE TO President Trump.

Aside from the hysterical reaction of some women in this :"game": they want us to forget that women by nature are manipulative and conniving (those present are exceptions, of course).

Think of such pedigreed examples as Lady Macbeth and Salome.

It's a 3 day delay. If it gives Flake and the other three fence sitters some cover fine. Since it's limited to the issues before the committee which have been investigated there won't be much to it.

So the FBI goes to Mark Judge:

FBI: Mr. Judge, what can you tell me about the party?

MJ: What party?

FBI: The one where Brett attacked Christine

MJ: I said I didn't recall it.

FBI: Well, can you tell me whose house it was at.

MJ: Dude, I can't recall it.

FBI: Do you recall who else was there?

MJ: I. Can't. Recall. It.

FBI: Was it you or Brett who pushed Christine into the room?

MJ: Dude!

FBI: There's no reason to be rude, It's just my job to investigate whether Mr. Kavanaugh assaulted Dr. Ford.

MJ: Dude, I already said I never saw Brett behave in that manner.

FBI: So how did he usually attack women?

MJ: I think we're done here. Why don't you talk to my lawyer.

Later:

FBI report: Mr. Judge did not furnish additional information beyond his original statement.

Never said that...he is not and neither is Trump.

Kavanaugh has never show a precedent for that behavior and a slew of witnesses to testify to that fact.
I was responding to your imply that trump was.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TracyLynn1...

And according to you, Kavanaugh is a rapist?

Never mind evidence, right?

Trumpet was a playboy, never a rapist.

It is noteworthy that the letter the Judiciary Committee received from the ABA was written by a Robert Carlson, a H Clinton donor. The ABA clarified Friday night that they had not received his letter.

In other words, Mr. Carlson is free-lancing for partisan purposes and the Senate should ignore him. For the rest of us, however, this is one more reason to bar the ABA from any judicial vetting. Some of us still remember the ABA’s shoddy treatment of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas.

Trump is more subdued b/c he has some skeletons in the closet.

In this case he was no better than the Clintons who routinely threw people under the bus who did not deliver as they wished.

So as this extra week of Flake's flaking waiting drags by, what else shall the Jackass Party drag out of the guano stinking mire in the meantime?
You know, to accuse Kavenaugh of doing something else dirty way back during the 1980s?
Would it be pimping college coeds or worse~oh, how un-PC!~his describing female college students as coeds.?
Sodomizing sophomores?
Running sex slave transactions?
Bestiality?
Pedophilia?
Now that Gloria Allred has made a legitimizing PR performance for being seen with actual rape victims during Bill Cosby's sentencing, perhaps the worst case scenario would be her marching out a string of several Kavenaugh accusers.
The more the merrier!
Then the Dems would demand a separate hearing for each and every accuser through the midterm elections of November.
The only thing that will shock me dino will be no new staged bimbo eruptions popping up at all.

I'm more anxious about who will hit the home run.
Trumps reaction is telling, in fact, his reaction, his interviews, even his tweets have been tame and thoughtful.
With a man like that, one would have to conclude he has an Ace in the hole and he is not even putting on his poker face.

The short answer?...we will have to painfully, wait and see.

Flake is a statist looter CINO.
I'm not a big supporter of the jurist in question, but I sincerely hope this is a show to distract from something else important.

Who's on first?

I actually think it will be helpful.
She named a number of people, let them be fully interviewed by the FBI and see if there is any corroboration.
So far, the "other" people have said no.
It is implausible that she can't figure out who she went/drove to that party with. How many friends with a car that went to parties could she have known. Interview all of the possible drivers and one of them will remember.
She claims a "life changing emotional" event. The friend taking her home would remember such a "Lets get out of here NOW" situation and the drive home. If not, then she is mixing up past memories.

If Obama was president his pick for the Supreme Court would have been appointed and sworn in before hearings could even begin. We would all then have been subjugated to Obamacourt dealing out collective punishment to productive straight white Christian males with high IQSs.

It's a show, buttons have been pushed, the people have seen and hopefully they go down in a blaze.
It's a dangerous time...they will go berserk, they will riot in the streets...beware.

Something else is going on and it ain't the post modern monkey show, something that will survive, be more prepared or finished in a week.

Sit back, get some corn and watch the show...it's a modern day Abbot and Costello.

So no reactions?

Trump just lost me as a supporter.