Those Who Take Government Money Should Not Vote
Elected officials, appointed officials, employees of agencies and departments, soldiers, police, teachers, people on welfare...
You might think that if people on welfare could not vote, the Democrat party would be hurt (and it would) but the Republican Party would suffer more. People on welfare, as we usually think of it, as aid to families with children, already tend not to vote. The habitual turn-out at the polls comes from old people, Republicans on social security.
For myself, serving in the Texas Military Department, I decided not to vote in state elections.
(See my blog post here: https://necessaryfacts.blogspot.com/2... )
What about people who work for Lockheed-Martin, Boeing, ArmaLite, or Wornick?
Where do you draw the line? By what standard do you decide?
You might think that if people on welfare could not vote, the Democrat party would be hurt (and it would) but the Republican Party would suffer more. People on welfare, as we usually think of it, as aid to families with children, already tend not to vote. The habitual turn-out at the polls comes from old people, Republicans on social security.
For myself, serving in the Texas Military Department, I decided not to vote in state elections.
(See my blog post here: https://necessaryfacts.blogspot.com/2... )
What about people who work for Lockheed-Martin, Boeing, ArmaLite, or Wornick?
Where do you draw the line? By what standard do you decide?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 6.
I do agree that Welfare recipients and non-essential (and EXTRA-Constitutional) government employees should not be allowed to vote for raises for themselves.
People on social security should be able to vote until they have received in benefits all the money they were forced to pay into the socialist system. Then they should have the option to either keep receiving benefits or to be able to vote. I also think that the social security system should be ended now and taxes stopped for those no longer in the system. Everyone over 50 can stay in at current levels of taxes and benefits. Only those over 60 will still get a COLA to benefits. Everyone under 51 is out. We, the people, have to eat the future excess cost (over taxes paid in) of those who stay in. Medicare should be privatized with no guarantees to current recipients.
Government employees and employees of contractors and lobbyists should not be allowed to vote until 5 years after they are no longer pigging out at the government trough. Medicare recipients should be given the same option: vote or get benefits, not both.
I don't care what party gets hurt. The 2 major parties both reek of wallowing in the public trough and violating their oaths to the constitution.
I'd also put other restrictions on voting, requiring understanding of the original constitution and bill of rights with emphasis on government having no power to do anything unless it is specifically written overtly in the constitution. The "commerce clause" should be dead. The "necessary and proper" clause should be dead. Anything done with those in mind are invalid and must be overtly allowed only by constitutional amendment.
While I see the logic on Federal Employees, theoretically they are providing a service for what they do. Certainly the military employees are.
A simple standard of services or products in a competitive environment Is where the standard should start.
"You know, we're all built on our formative experiences," Mattis said. "When I was 18, I joined the Marine Corps, and in the U.S. military, we are proudly apolitical. By that, I mean that in our duties, we were brought up to obey the elected commander in chief, whoever that is. And we've seen, over those -- since I was in the military longer than some of you have been alive, I have seen Republicans and Democrats come and go."
"(Mattis Hit Back at Trump's Claim" - https://www.foxnews.com/politics/matt... )
It is a good sounding concept on the surface. Very hard (impossible?) to define well enough for a workable rule.
But as you point out, that could include many in government, those with special interests...maybe we should re-enact the 3/5ths clause on the outlying categories...
I am laughing but, first, I think, we need to vanquish the false idea that we are a demonocracy...that's Not going to go over very well...