Governor Kate Brown pushes bill to have Universal state visits to parents and their newborns.

Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 2 months ago to History
43 comments | Share | Flag

For a political party who doesn’t even know what gender a soul is. LBGTQWHATTHEFAMI. These people who want you to kill your baby just before delivery ,so they can sell the body parts. After that Then they will decide if you are following subjective state rules for childcare in your own home if you have a baby. First of all consider this. Children placed in foster care are 50% more likely to suffer abuse.
The reality is the state will send in a “nurse or a childcare specialist” who will probably have a quota a QUOTA . They will determine if the child is being cared for according to their subjective opinion.
It is expected that every new mother will be “visited” 3 times. This is not acceptable.
Speak up. Light up the dark intent. We are in an “Uncivil War “ we must fight back. There is no gulch this is where we all reside. Stand up against this enslavment. Think about some genderless stranger from the state visiting your daughter and deciding they want your grandchild to be placed in the care of the state.

The proposed bill is a continuation of policies straight out of the Obama White House which aggressively sought to nudge Americans toward accepting ever-increasing government involvement in their private lives.

With the introduction of its Julia website, the Obama Administration demonstrated how a person could be wholly government dependent, from birth until death. The site was short-lived as Americans recoiled from its premise, with even CNN calling it the “Wrong vision for America.”


All Comments

  • Posted by $ Abaco 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And...FWIW...the answer to what's driving it is actually in the text. Hidden in plain sight.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They'll take the kids and throw the parents in jail - yes. Not much different than a farmer taking calves from the cow and holding them in a pen to be fattened up for slaughter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you . I was hoping you would see my comment asking you. I will do some digging.
    My instincts immediately tell me this is part of a bigger plan. I hate most of the plans made for us because they are basically plans for someone else like the planners.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I've seen things over the past decade that are absolutely over-the-top shocking. I'm pretty guarded on this stuff. You want a hint, a tiny example?

    Soon you will see new medical clinics constructed on public school campuses. Won't say how I know this. But, just last week I predicted it with a couple close associates and today I got a phone call on the first one I've heard being planned. That's all I'm gonna say about that. They didn't have money for school nurses in the 90s and beyond...but they suddenly have funding to build medical clinics on elementary schools. Mull that one over...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Control via using "controls" is what this big government socualist PC overreach is all about.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by chad 6 years, 2 months ago
    Although all countries are statists by nature some are too poor or backward to implement what is coming here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course what I was referring to is the CURRENT definition of government in our statist society.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I liked 25% of the government shut down. Lets just make it the least "needed" sections of it. Sexual reproduction of kangaroo rats and the like- get rid of them and the people working there. Definitely dont give retroactive pay for sitting at home and that would cause a bunch of quits. Good riddance.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I hope so. so far trump has exceeded all my expectations. However....I am not holding my breath on any departments getting shut down.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I say the government looks for "problems", plays politics to convince citizens to let them "try".

    But the purpose of government is to promote government itself and provide money for its minions. Anything else is solely accidental, and in fact they hope their efforts are NOT succesful so they can use the failures to ask for more resources.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Every thing is not as it seems to be. This Build the Wall narrative is designed to show the people the Demons don't care about American citizens. The wall is being built Trump has said so many times.
    The Govt shutdown was a trial run to see what are essential services are needed.
    The next one will be used to cut a lot of fat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump seems to be pandering a bit to the other side in some misguided attempt to get bi partisanship. I say- how to you negotiate with someone breaking into your house and trying to take your stuff or kill you. Do you allow them to take "some" of your stuff so they dont kill you, or do you fight it on principle? Trump should just do what he can while he is in office , like declare a national emergency, and get a few things done
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Soma-coma comes to mind as well. I think that movie was "THX1136".

    Edit: Maybe "Brave New World". I haven't seen either in a very long time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    These are "ideas" the left "explores" to increase their control to a 100% of the population.

    It started with Stalin's execution of 10-20 million people in order to eliminate the "deviants".

    Methods became more sophisticated since (not everywhere though), at least in the "civilized West".

    They keep pushing until a colossal failure ensues that wipes everyone and everything out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago
    One thing Jordan Peterson said in one of his YouTube videos- If you have an aggressive kid at 4, he will be aggressive at 15 and probably in jail shortly thereafter. Until aggressive behavior settles down at 27. SO, the government probably figures they can "solve" this problem by somehow calming down the 4 year olds in the first place through enforced parenting.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 6 years, 2 months ago
    this has operated in some states off and on since the influx of outcome based ed under Clinton. It is all a tip of the hat to ole Chairman Mao, and his cradle to grave, get kids away from parents as soon as possible. Only the state can best indoctrinate the children to think correctly, the parents might corrupt them. God forbid parents might be religious gun owners too! They are in the parents lives from then on, and if parents act conservative, children's services just might show up for an inspection. It happened to our neighbor, who lived in a five bedroom house, with every bedroom opening to the swimming pool. But, they made the mistake of grounding their 13 year old who was sneaking out that patio door to meet boys. In came children's sevrices when she told someone about being grounded. They are not our children, remember Hillary's village? Parent have to interact with the kids, warn them of the dangers, that they could end up in foster care, and if they are about 10, give them their own copy of "Anthem", they are old enough to get it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The first guy in my lifetime that seems likely to shrink the federal government is Trump.....but I have not seen him speak directly to reducing headcount....just limiting power. He may not be in a position to reduce headcount without taking an ax to it...by closing down the government for more than a month and laying off whole departments as is proscribed by law. He is legitimately trying to govern....but Pelosi and company will not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had in mind houses like in Oliver Twist, where children are housed like cattle under nasty and demanding overlords
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo