All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -5
    Posted by PeterSmith 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why? This is an Objectivist blog, not confused, religious leftists, that want to ban abortion and are engaging in dishonest reporting of issues, in order to advance this authoritarian agenda.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No , it’s interesting the timing of all of it. Especially with RBG who appears to be the six million dollar woman. and Trump in Meetings with Kim Jung un.
    In Vietnam. Would be symbolic to Baphomet.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry, my bad. I did a quick scan and didn't see a title that started with the word "Democrats."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If the mother or the mothers family/husband still didn't want the baby then that would be the correct solution.
    Just read a story this morning about a mother that birthed a baby boy and it was discovered that the boy had down syndrome and they have a program that takes care of babies like that,
    The mother made the decision to give up the baby and told the husband to choose, get rid of the kid or get a divorce...the husband chose to keep the boy.
    She filed for divorce.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So if the mother decided to abort the child but the child still survived, should the surviving child be taken away from that mother and given to the care of the foundation, with the voluntarily funded resources to take care of the child?
    That enforcement would be the role of a government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My guess is it will. I expect in the next 5 -10 years it will be okay to off a 2 month old that became an inconvenience. Really, it has no more chance of survival than a preemie at 30 weeks. No care, it dies. In fact, that's pretty much true up to a number of years old. Makes me wonder what the future holds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would and I would not be surprised if Mercury One would start a fund very soon just for that purpose.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 6 years, 11 months ago
    So who here would voluntarily donate to a, “Save the Infants Foundation”, which uses its own money and resources to help save infants?
    Of course with the compulsory system we have now this question is fairly meaningless.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 6 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I want to see "saving infants from botched abortions" come under attack here.
    Me dino has no interest in expending the time and energy that I did last time.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo