Was this valid questioning or just an attack?

Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 6 years, 2 months ago to Politics
44 comments | Share | Flag

Seems, based on her obvious religious persuasion that she isn't one to be asking questions about human rights.
Let the debating begin.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by mccannon01 6 years, 2 months ago
    I've seen a snippet of this on the news, but it's nice to see a bit more. Thanks, rockymountainpirate, for putting this up.

    This imbecile (Omar) is so full of herself and her "seat of power over others" that she couldn't hide the smirk as she pontificated (if such a word applies to a Muslim) her nonsense. She couldn't even read the script from her imam handlers. She started off by addressing Abrams as "Mr. Adams", so she can't even read his name correctly and stuttered through the rest as if she were just catching on to the English language. One word comes to mind every time I see or hear her: taqiyya.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It was, absolutely, an attack. She never really asked a question, so much as make a statement, to which he was never given the chance to respond to.
    The chairman of that circus should be boiled in oil for letting her continue with her tirade.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rtpetrick 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, a "piece of work" from the "religion of peace". What a tragic excuse for a human being.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rtpetrick 6 years, 2 months ago
    She is an infidel-hating Muslim. What else do you need to know? Check out Sura 9:5 for your answer.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BCRinFremont 6 years, 2 months ago
    I wonder if she swore in on a Koran when she pledged to support and defend the Constitution of the United States?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That too. Yet people are forced to answer questions preceded with false premises all the time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Eyecu2 6 years, 2 months ago
    I watched this yesterday. The feeling that I got from the questioning was that there was no good answer to her questions and she intentionally asked them in this manner in order to try to humiliate him. I think that he show incredible restraint by not verbally lashing out at his antagonist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    She probably expects a few raisins out of someone's 72 for fauxly winning that battle in her head.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 6 years, 2 months ago
    There was special viciousness because Abrams is Jewish. Because Muhammad hated Jews for them mocking him when he announced his "revelations," Muslims hate Jews with a passion apart from any real grievances.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I definitely am kinder in what I write online than I really think or feel. What you write online is there forever.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    She is a programed muslim to the core, with all the stupidity that comes from it.
    She is a radical muslim, idiotic barker wearing femininist, marxist barbarian with no conscience, no introspection and no intellect what so ever.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 6 years, 2 months ago
    It would appear to me that Representative Omar does not realize she is a member of the United States House of Representatives. She is destructive, argumentative, and rude. Why doesn't she do the job she was elected to do?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 6 years, 2 months ago
    Like most "questioning" by politicians (and all court lawyers, too), there is much pontificating prior to the eventual question ... and no opportunity to reject the premise.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo