11

Why is the New Left violent?

Posted by Vinay 6 years ago to Culture
34 comments | Share | Flag

The New Left is not interested in civil discourse. This is why.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by 6 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you, although in this particular case, I am merely the editor and publisher. But the platform exists to spread the truth.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 6 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The other question is, how does a follower of postmodern values swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? They believe that that there is no truth, that you can’t tell the truth, nor can you tell a lie; all you can do is tell an interesting or uninteresting story.
    These people are hidden in every nook and cranny of society. How is justice suppose to work within this narrative?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 6 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Technocracy.The birth of the green movement.

    What Is Technocracy

    We are a non-profit membership organization founded in 1933.

    Our Mission is to serve local and global communities by providing an informational network in support of a functional and thriving planet. We will inform, educate, and empower the public toward new approaches to sustainable systems by modeling cooperative systems and incorporating scientific research and cumulative
    Ideas.

    Our Vision is to create and share working models and processes that encourage people to use energy, resources, and processing of waste in the most efficient and sustainable ways possible.

    From this global warming then climate change was born.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 10
    Posted by Solver 6 years ago
    Their goal is world statism. Their method is using power to control others by any means necessary. They do it religiously in the name of the “greater good” of the promised marxist Utopia.

    “Statism is a system of institutionalized violence and perpetual civil war. It leaves men no choice but to fight to seize political power -- to rob or be robbed, to kill or be killed. ... Statism survives by looting; a free country survives by production.”
    -Ayn Rand.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 6 years ago
    Well, "A standard problem that good people have in fighting bad people is that the bad are willing to use tactics that the good are not willing to use. And good people resist using those tactics because they don’t want to turn into the bad." and the New Demoncrat Socialist Party was taught to use every weapon at their disposal, use every advantage, and this is one.

    This is very important" The American postmodern philosopher, Richard Rorty put it this way in a revealing moment: “Truth is what your contemporaries let you get away with saying.” Note that getting away with stuff is being legitimized by a famous philosopher.

    Rorty’s postmodern fellow-travelers in France—Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and others—work the same broadly deconstructive territory.

    This issue is crucial. It’s the difference between two detectives arguing in a forensic lab over the best interpretation of the evidence, assuming their goals are truth and justice, and those lawyers who see the courtroom only as a power struggle in which all that matters is who is best at rhetorical affect on the jury and procedural manipulation of the rules of evidence."

    Every time Pelosi and Schumer said "There's no emergency, no crisis" at the border, and then all the non aligned sheeple cried "Trump shut down the government" that was proven. No one took the facts, the data and said "Yep, it's now an official hellhole". So, 6 months later, no immigration reform, no laws, nothing of any value from the House except more Trump Impeachment, more Trump collusion and more silence on the real issues. Yet go look at the video where Obamas former Border Patrol Director is calling out Congress, and the lack of laws, and the fact the crisis is now the worst in history. 2 different narratives, 2 different realities. So, as long as the demoncrats get away with their stories, in the media, it becomes Truth.

    Bingo!: "Here again Richard Rorty represents, to my mind, the postmodern side. When he was asked directly about the political Left’s many historical sins, crimes, and outright brutalities—and it is important to notice here that all of the leading postmodernists of the first two generations are of the Left, usually the very Far Left—in response to this question about the Left’s many historical sins, Rorty replied: “I think that a good Left is a party that always thinks about the future and doesn’t care much about our past sins.” Absolutely ture and seen everyday. Despite a flood of condemnation and criminal facts, the Socialist Democrats continue to chant their prayers to Impeach Trump and that is it. Their single mindedness shows this statement to be true, they do not care about anything but that objective (which will never happen, ever, their coup attempt failed), but they never are accountable for their statements, lies or simple fantasies about Trump. It does go back to they never look back, no matter how bad, how stupid, how much of a lie they told, they never look back, and the media supports it. Unless you are a Republicrat, then they love to look back. It is all about optics.

    I think we need to render philosophy back down to a set of morals that support society, not the state as an organism. The individual is responsible, and is held as a responsible accountable for their statements, their actions and their efforts. Trying to get 2 or 3 generations of village idiots taught something as esoteric as philosophy would be like signing at the roof of a burning building, it will be your downfall before you get to the last chorus. It may be a good solution, but is lacking in the war we fight today, this is not just about this issue, it is a whole society that has been sickened, intentionally, to weaken it to make it die, so it can be replaced with "their vision". At that point philosophy will not exist, just state doctrine. That may have been one of Ayn Rands warnings from AS, fiddle too long, and you will lose. We cannot wait for a Gault to come rescue us, we have to do it ourselves.

    Good article.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo