Work place re education training. Is this really good for the business?

Posted by RandRat 5 years, 10 months ago to Business
49 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The following is a real company directive. Identify the premise. Have discussion on how this would impact a large retail business and its employees. I have a very strong opinion about this as it directly offends... err... impacts me.


From: Shxxx Oxxx, Chief Diversity Officer
To: All Mxxx Colleagues

Coming Soon: Companywide Inclusive Workplace Training

One of the simplest ways to help promote diversity and inclusion at Xxxxx is to avoid bias in how we think, act and operate. Bias is one of the greatest roadblocks to an inclusive culture, especially because while the judgements we sometimes make about individuals or groups are often unintentional, they can have a big impact.

On Monday, June xx, we’re launching a new required course, Inclusive Workplace: Understanding and Managing Unconscious Bias, that will teach you how to understand, identify and mitigate bias. This is an expansion of the instructor-led course that Directors and above completed last year.

The new, online course will shed light on the impact of unconscious bias in the workplace and identify strategies to help you manage bias in everyday interactions with colleagues and, as applicable, customers. You’ll learn simple tips to start using immediately. If you participated in an unconscious bias session last year, this will be a great refresher.

The companywide training schedule is below. Timing varies based on your function and role. Look for an email with additional course information and instructions when it’s time to complete your training.

Corporate and Support Functions (including Sxxx Cxxxx)
• June xx-July xx | People Leaders and all Exempt Colleagues
• July x-August xx | Non-exempt Colleagues without direct reports

Xxxxx
• July x-xx | People Leaders and all Exempt Colleagues
• July xx-September xx | Non-exempt Colleagues without direct reports

Fostering a diverse and inclusive culture isn’t just the right thing to do. It’s crucial to building our business, developing top talent and responding effectively to changing customer expectations. The small choices that you make in the moments that matter can have a big impact on our colleagues, customers and community.

Thank you for your participation and support.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by chad 5 years, 10 months ago
    I refuse to be inclusive of everyone. I discriminate with every choice and person I meet. I decide if it is in my intereste to interact with every individual. How else can you avoid interactions that will harm you? I decide based on moral guidelines who I want to interact with. Others may use what I would consider faulty guidelines, I do not consider that it is my place to impose guidelines upon them. I was shopping today and arrived at the register just as a lady with a full basket of items noticed me and offered to let me go first because I only had one item. I deffered, because she was there first and she was a lady. She insisted and I accepted her invitation. I thanked her and when I was done I thanked her again for being gracious. It was a pleasant encounter with someone who was being generous and she knew I appreciated her willingness to wait a few moments. I wonder how many unconscious biases' we were guilty of? I never tolerated laziness or unsafe behavior from my employees and when the state got involved and wanted to use violence to ensure proper behavior on my part I got out of the employee business.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 10 months ago
    All this does is making people's lives miserable.

    You are not allowed to think independently, let alone freely, lest something creeps in there that is considered biased. People would feel guilty all the time, which is the idea behind this crap.

    Guilty people are easy to control.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Graduates from “gender studies” are trained activists. Useful idiots ideologically programmed to take down America.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dukem 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I always thought that "attitude adjustment" process involved tinkling glasses. Silly and old fashioned me.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by shaifferg 5 years, 10 months ago
    To see how impossible this is and how remote the chances of success search out a copy of Joel Barkers "the business of paradigms". I challenge you to spot the problem with a deck of cards on the first pass. We all have these "blinders"; some of us are aware they exist.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 10 months ago
    I am sick and tired of "diversity and inclusion".

    The most visible effect of this directive is tolerating underperforming employees who would otherwise be terminated.

    We need to "understand" and be emphatic.

    Companies are hiring people with degrees in "Gender studies" to lead and head these efforts.

    That must be very effective tackling underperforming business units!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And you know they love to hand out favors, to be paid for by other people’s money.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 5 years, 10 months ago
    Its pure bullshit. The companies that adopt it will eventually fail unless propped up by government favors
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 5 years, 10 months ago
    I worked for a subcontractor on a Boeing contract back when they had their big sexual harassment scandal. Part of the settlement imposed on them was that they had to "educate" all the workers (including subcontractors) that sexual harassment was wrong. At the conclusion of the education session, the Boeing educator asked if anyone had any comments, and regretted it, as I said I felt I had just received a sermon on abstinence from the owner of a bordello.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Diversity blood! To make an omelette you got to break some eggs.
    Maybe that’s how The Walking Dead started.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    For Those same rammers of diversity should they have an accident , we must make sure they receive blood from all types.
    Mix the blood types (A+, A-, B+, B-, O+, O-, AB+, AB-).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Only thing that matters to the people behind these feel good mandates is power, and that you agree unquestionably to THEIR ideological biases.

    What is their actual “policy?”
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Leitchj 5 years, 10 months ago
    Here's our company's inclusion and diversity policy given to every new employee during inprocessing: "Race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, age don't matter here. The only two things that matter are integrity and performance. Welcome!"
    We practice what we preach too and have a very diverse workforce of professionals who embrace our policy.
    BTW, if you knew how HARD the government was ramming diversity and inclusion down all government employee and contractor's throats, it would make you nauseous.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "We need concise answers..."

    You're talking about a very complicated issue - an issue you don't even begin to understand - and you're going to legislate according to your own explicit biases and ignorance rather than listen to a subject-matter expert testify... Yup. That's one of the reasons I have no desire to emulate Canada.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    When I worked in Washington, we would go to Pine Island, Georgia, for 'Attitude Adjustment'. Quite an interesting event.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 5 years, 10 months ago
    I'm going into some re-education like this in about 30 minutes. While getting my coffee I was standing with a few very wonderful female coworkers. I told them, "I'm going in to the policy training a little later this morning. So, I thought I'd take the opportunity now to tell you that you all look wonderful today. (they laughed) After the meeting I'll never say such things again." One said, "Yeah, we'll have to act like we don't like each other." I walked off with, "I never liked that guy, anyway..." They laughed some more. This is all so stupid...

    I'm quick to call out racism no matter who it's directed to or coming from. That's real equality. The leftists hate that. So be it. I'm too old to start living a lie...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 10 months ago
    Like I said, 'These HR folks don't have enough to do!'
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 10 months ago
    A representative of our federal government paid a call on me. She reviewed my performance and asked for a list of my patients by ethnicity. I informed her, 'I don't keep a list by ethnicity. I list patients by illness!' She hugged me and said, "oh my, you're color-blind!' I assured her I was and couldn't tell black or brown from white!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 5 years, 10 months ago
    The "diversity" training that was clearly understood while I was employed at a large corporation was that any job posting that stated "Diverse candidates welcome" meant "white male need not apply".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 5 years, 10 months ago
    I have a client that seems to be on this path. They are requiring employees and vendors to be on board. There is no formal training for vendors but claim they are allowed to review vendor policies upon request. This is a large world wide corporation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 10 months ago
    Professor Jordan Peterson has lectures on this kind of far left brainwashing scheme. He says there is zero evidence of positive impact yet some evidence of negative impact.

    Here is a six minute video snippet from 2017 where Jordan Peterson is having a deeply rational scientific discussion with some other professors about this type of “training” being made mandatory in many colleges, universities and now workplaces.
    https://youtu.be/TXPGuWQHqNw
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Charner59 5 years, 10 months ago
    I was not sure of the category to submit.
    Philosophy is deeply involved as ethics and principals guide the premise of the directive. This company sees it employees (and customers) driven by sub conscious bias and thinking in their relationships. Which code the authors of the directive base their assumptions of individuals is not stated. Certainly worthy of ethical discussion. Who thinks of this stuff and why? Politics may have been an obvious choice but for the lack of a stated agenda. This directive is PC driven and reflects where our culture is going. This is for sure political push back following the 2016 POTUS decision of US voters. Education also a viable choice for category. From where do these directive authors get this type of thinking? I don't believe humans are born with such evil outlooks of other humans. At least not to the extent of sending us all off to re-education and sub conscious alteration training. The Chief Diversity Officer of this company most likely is a product of 4 to 8 year higher education camps.
    Business was my selection. The impacts on my personal economy via business are paramount to my life. I want my business to succeed. As it does so do I. When an entity comes along and threatens my business, I react. This directive has made me react. Thoughts?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo