John Galt a libertairian modeled off of Jesus?

Posted by jyokela 11 years, 2 months ago to Books
168 comments | Share | Flag

I have to say no on both counts.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    well many Christian scholars used Platoic arguments for the defense of Christianity lated, including St Augustine. But to look at the early writers of the books that would be chosen and rejected for the New Testament, here is an article arguing the case:
    http://sguthrie.net/greekchristian.htm
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Hey, here's a Norseman (sorry, "Vikings" grates on my brain... blame Story City) poem you should appreciate (Rand might have, if she ever deigned to read Kipling....)

    (did I already link this one?)
    http://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/ki...

    Song of the Red War-Boat

    (A.D. 683 )
    "The Conversion of St. Wilfrid"--Rewards and Fairies

    Shove off from the wharf-edge! Steady!
    Watch for a smooth! Give way!
    If she feels the lop already
    She'll stand on her head in the bay.
    It's ebb--it's dusk--it's blowing--
    The shoals are a mile of white,
    But ( snatch her along! ) we're going
    To find our master to-night.

    For we hold that in all disaster
    Of shipwreck, storm, or sword,
    A Man must stand by his Master
    When once he has pledged his word.

    Raging seas have we rowed in
    But we seldom saw them thus,
    Our master is angry with Odin--
    Odin is angry with us!
    Heavy odds have we taken,
    But never before such odds.
    The Gods know they are forsaken.
    We must risk the wrath of the Gods!

    Over the crest she flies from,
    Into its hollow she drops,
    Cringes and clears her eyes from
    The wind-torn breaker-tops,
    Ere out on the shrieking shoulder
    Of a hill-high surge she drives.
    Meet her! Meet her and hold her!
    Pull for your scoundrel lives!

    The thunder below and clamor
    The harm that they mean to do!
    There goes Thor's own Hammer
    Cracking the dark in two!
    Close! But the blow has missed her,
    Here comes the wind of the blow!
    Row or the squall'Il twist her
    Broadside on to it!--Row!

    Heark'ee, Thor of the Thunder!
    We are not here for a jest--
    For wager, warfare, or plunder,
    Or to put your power to test.
    This work is none of our wishing--
    We would house at home if we might--
    But our master is wrecked out fishing.
    We go to find him to-night.

    For we hold that in all disaster--
    As the Gods Themselves have said--
    A Man must stand by his Master
    Till one of the two is dead.

    That is our way of thinking,
    Now you can do as you will,
    While we try to save her from sinking
    And hold her head to it still.
    Bale her and keep her moving,
    Or she'll break her back in the trough. . . .
    Who said the weather's improving,
    Or the swells are taking off?

    Sodden, and chafed and aching,
    Gone in the loins and knees--
    No matter--the day is breaking,
    And there's far less weight to the seas!
    Up mast, and finish baling--
    In oar, and out with mead--
    The rest will be two-reef sailing. . . .
    That was a night indeed!

    But we hold it in all disaster
    (And faith, we have found it true!)
    If only you stand by your Master,
    The Gods will stand by you!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I liked the speeches; the Money speech, the trial of Hank Rearden... but only part of the Galt speech. While I focused on the part of that speech regarding the value of individual aspiration, most here, apparently, only focused on the "Christians are evil bastards" part of the speech. (did he even invoke the word "Christian" in that speech?...)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Christian mystic" is an oxymoron. There's no point in discussing the matter with you if you're just going to spew insults.

    Yes, let's examine that bit of history... the knowledge preserved by the Catholics to be used by those reasonable men in the Enlightenment and the Renaissance as they used the preserved knowledge to murder and enslave one another.
    Pope Julius attempted to have the Church act as a check on the lust for power of the kings and petty warlords of western europe, and nearly lost the Church and his life in the endeavor.

    Meanwhile, the eastern... the *Christian* eastern Roman empire never fell...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    hey! no one calls you names in here. Frankly, I disagree on that other post. I notice you did not answer any of my questions put to those of you who got upset. So, I will not put them on this post. I can't speak for the other Objectivists on this post, but even you reject the comparison. So one wonders at the point of an entire talk testing the premise. It is a common theme in literature and so didn't bug me that much, but clearly it bothers others. One possibility is the many Christians (not yourself) are drawn to Atlas Shrugged. Even though they understand many, many contradictions between their philosophy and Objectivism, they are still compelled by the story. It's natural to try and soften the contradictions. by rationalizing parallels if possible. Is it such a stretch to imagine that Objectivists would be angered by those comparisons and not want a bunch of publicity about this-as opposed to other essential themes and ideas regarding Objectivism to be explored? But I agree with you-I have no idea why this heats everyone up to name calling. uh, including you. two name calls in one post hiraghm. Is that a record?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimjamesjames 11 years, 2 months ago
    I see similarities in the structure (Atlas Shrugged, The Fountainhead and the Bible) from Stages of the Monomyth (Joseph Campbell)

    Departure
    The Call to Adventure
    Refusal of the Call
    Supernatural Aid
    The Crossing of the First Threshold
    Belly of The Whale
    Initiation
    The Road of Trials
    The Meeting With the Goddess
    Woman as Temptress
    Return
    Refusal of the Return
    The Magic Flight
    Rescue from Without
    The Crossing of the Return Threshold
    Master of Two Worlds
    Freedom to Live

    Character similarities include that neither Jesus nor Galt advocated initiating force, both "sold" their thoughts to those who would listen and let them make the own decisions, both advocated the supposed outcome in terms of benefits, i.e, freedom from being subject to force (Galt) and salvation (Jesus).

    I think the good preacher's claim of the life of Jesus being impetus for Rand's hero's is a stretch. For me, it's simply good story telling.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My feelings aren't all that delicate. After LetsGet bemoans the influence of Christians in her objective zen garden, here we go with yet another attack launched on Christianity.

    Let me just straighten it out from a Christian point of view: the important difference from John Galt as a libertarian from Jesus...

    Outside his own mind, John Galt is not God.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    yeah... uhm... tell me which Roman generals he defeated?

    Oh! I have one for you... Name the founder of the only empire never to be defeated? Ruler of a land far more vast than the Roman Empire?

    The quintessential looter... Genghis Khan. Did he study Aristotle, too?

    And no, it doesn't work that way. db made an assertion, the burden is on him to back it up.
    He didn't say Christianity was aligned with playdough, he said it was based on playdough.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by overmanwarrior 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We only know how man undestood Christ as second handers. Altuism tainted the translation. Christ was going down an individually based religion as opposed to an orthadox church. Thats what got him killed. People later tried to give meaning to it..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ShruginArgentina 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And if you want to fast foward to a time when it is possible to compare the "contribution of the Christian "mystics" to the advancement of man's mind with the contribution of atheist "realists" fast foward to the centuries when Christianity previaled in Westen Europe: aka "The Dark Ages" to the reemergence of reason during The Enlightenment and the Renissance...which then led to the Industrrial evoultion and a Galt like world.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ShruginArgentina 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As Ayn Rand used the term, Christianity is a form of mysticism, and she applied it to ALL beliefs in the supenatural, whether espoused by tribal witch doctors or Popes.

    A comparrison of reason and mysticism should begin with a review of the difference between Aristotle and Plato...and not skip directly to Christianity.

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    well, you give me the foundational tenets of Christianity and I will show you how they align with Plato.
    As to your navel gazing joke-the next significant historical figure to come out of the time was taught by Aristotle and I think we can agree Alexander the Great was no rowdy farmer
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    he's pretty frustrated with me on this post--joke aside. sorry to have upset your delicate feelings
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for sharing... Please stop.... now.

    Kindly leave your sex life out of the discussion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Proof that Christianity is based on Plato's metaphysics? Funny, I don't see him mentioned in the New Testament.

    Q: What did Plato have in common with Aristotle?

    A: They were both from a nation of navel gazers. And while they were gazing at their navels, a bunch of rowdy Roman farmers took their empire away from them.

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Quality is no longer an issue.

    The infinitely malleable American mind was conditioned in the 70s to no longer seek quality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    government = "you".
    In the 19th century the government short-circuited the law of supply and demand with relation to labor at the behest of and for the benefit of business. You don't really think crony capitalists, looters and moochers were invented in the latter half of the 20th century, do you?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You make the mistake of equating mystics with Christians.
    Check your premises.

    Care to make a historic comparison of the contribution of the Christian "mystics" to the advancement of man's mind with the contribution of atheist "realists"?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    John Galt's not the ideal man, either. Except maybe in Rand's wet dreams.

    Why would it be surprising if there were parallels between Galt and Christ? I believe it's called a plot device.

    Hm... you just reminded me of something.

    Found it!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Quest_...

    And you have provided me with my new nickname for dbhalling...

    "Robass".

    "β€œTo believe in God. Bah.” (It was the first time Thomas had ever heard that word pronounced just as it is written.) β€œI have a perfectly constructed logical mind that cannot commit such errors.” " - The Quest for Saint Aquin
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Evangelicals are people too, after all. Why act surprised when they act like everybody else?

    If I'm not mistaken, the people making the movies and participating in this website... are trying to spread their faith and beliefs... even to the point of comparing Galt to historic and religious figures such as Jesus.

    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo